[Dotnetmock-developer] Commit emails, RFE 1001778, Licenses

[Choy R. <ch...@rc...>]

Griffin,

To start getting warmed up with the code, I decided to work on RFE
1001778, support out parameters. I made the request so it makes sense
for me to work on it. I've created a branch called RFE_1001778. So far,
I've only committed modifications to the ClassGenerator. I've got a ways
to go before I figure out the least invasive way to support out
parameters. I'll ask you to review the branch before I merge it into the
trunk.

Later when I feel comfortable, I'll set about implementing those
"expectation threads".
...

One thing that could help us work better together is if you set up the
repository to send commit emails (like we have in Spring.NET). The
directions on how to set it up are here:

http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=772&group_id=1#scrip
tsyncmail

And you could ask Mark Pollack too. The documentation recommends
starting a separate email list like
dot...@li... and directing the commit emails
there so that developers can choose to see the commits or not.

This way you could review my work as I modify the code and give me
immediate feedback.

...

I think we should be attaching some sort of license to all the source
code. I've only found one license and that was in Predicate.cs. So I've
been using that one. But upon closer examination I realize that it's a
log4j license which is probably not correct.

How about we use the same one as Spring.NET?
---
/*
 * Copyright 2002-2004 the original author or authors.
 * 
 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
 * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
 * You may obtain a copy of the License at
 * 
 *      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 * 
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
implied.
 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */
---

I could enter a bug for this, and we can address it in a future branch
with a perl script.

--Choy