dosemu-devel Mailing List for DOSEMU for Linux (Page 59)
Brought to you by:
bartoldeman
You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(35) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(138) |
Feb
(104) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
(21) |
Dec
|
2004 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(7) |
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(36) |
2006 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(6) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(9) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
2009 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(48) |
May
(25) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(22) |
2013 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(9) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(11) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Bart O. <bar...@bt...> - 2002-04-27 17:46:58
|
at 19:00 GMT, but I'm out for dinner tonight; I'll check when I come back home (probably ~22:00 GMT). irc.openprojects.net, channel #ldosemu Bart |
From: Hans L. <le...@fg...> - 2002-04-22 13:09:56
|
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Gabriel Marcelli wrote: > Ehm.. > i know it seems 'funny' but.. would it be > possible to port DosEmu under Win32? Sorry, but the aim of DOSEMU was to support Linux, ... not Bill Gates;-) Even if it simply would be 'porting' (and no complete redesign), we definitively do not have the man power (while Billy Boy _has_ it). > I think it would be a good idea, 'cos with new > Windows OS you can't run properly older software, > and, even with Win9x, newer hardware can't > neither do it You can buy VMware for Window and boot any older DOS within it. > : i refer myself to soundcards, > which can't use Opl2/Opl3 fm synthesis, so you > can't get running older soft (eg: games). > Instead, using the Win platform support, DosEmu > could (at least i hope) emulate everything in > a "Dos Box". > I know that emulating Dos under something that is > in fx Dos it's strange but.. would be useful! You are right, it _is_ strange :-) > Thanks for your attention. > > Gabriel Marcelli > Hans <le...@fg...> |
From: Bart O. <Bar...@br...> - 2002-04-13 17:10:18
|
Hi all, since dosemu.org is completely down now, we have it at irc.openprojects.net, 1900 GMT (that's one hour later for most of us than two weeks ago), channel #ldosemu. Hans, have you heard from the new ISP? whois dosemu.org still tells me about Nextra. Bart |
From: Stas S. <sts...@ya...> - 2002-04-09 20:54:35
|
Hi All. Kasper Dupont recently posted another lengthy patch that is intended to fix the remaining vm86 issues. The patch can be found here: http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0204.1/0245.html This patch seems rather good to me, but considering the previous faults, it must be audithed. He does some very good cosmetic optimisations like removing a "regs" parameter from a stack manipulating macros and simplified do_int(). However we still don't have a signal when a fault occures while the unmapped/protected memory is accessed by a stack-manipulating instruction which also causes a GPF (like pushf, popf, iret). Instead vm86() just returns with VM86_UNKNOWN, while normally page faults in vm86 produces a SIGSEGV. Also, looking at a code in /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c, I can see that do_segment_not_present() and do_stack_segment() sends a SIGBUS rather than a SIGSEGV, so I wonder if it would be correct to send SIGBUS in such setuation. Can anyone comment on this? However, with Casper's patch we don't have any signal at all. Can this trigger any problems? |
From: Bart O. <Bar...@br...> - 2002-04-03 02:38:05
|
Does anybody here know whether it's safe to signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN); in DOSEMU? I can't see why not. I sometimes did: dos -D+v -O 2>&1 | less and then pressing q in less caused DOSEMU to quit. It's nicer to keep it going - that also prevents leaving stale files in ~/.dosemu This was asked by Stas wrt a pipe for the Midi handling, but maybe you can point me to a counter-exception. Bart |
From: Alistair M. <ali...@sl...> - 2002-03-26 23:20:56
|
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Bart Oldeman wrote: > $ host -t MX scruz.org > scruz.org MX 10 linuxmafia.COM > aha - essentially all we need to do is to have some machine handling > mail; all it would need to do is to forward it. Yes. As has already been commented on we just need a dosemu.org MX record which diverts to a system which will accept mail *for* dosemu.org. What it does after that can be configured. At the moment that appears to mean that I have to get it pointed at my ADSL setup (which will probably not work because I think BT blocks incoming SMTP to ADSL services) or make my dedicated hosting box do it. I'll look into it. Alistair |
From: Bart O. <Bar...@br...> - 2002-03-26 18:56:32
|
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Alistair MacDonald wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Bart Oldeman wrote: > > > dosemu-bugs: > > archive is accessible for members only > > anyone can post > > subscription needs approval (from me) > > OK. Got the mail. I'm not sure if we will need dosemu-bugs to work like > this in the future. Given we don't have a working GNATS setup, which was > the original reason for the address, we might be better to move to the > trakcing tools on SF now. At which point we can make the old address an > auto-responder. The problem will be that the dosemu-bugs address is > supposed to be on dosemu.org and SF.net will probably not accept that. We > might still need to do some playing with the mail configurations. Got it as well. Agreed - dosemu-devel is easy as it's a closed list. But the mail sent to addresses dos...@do..., and also to le...@do... and ba...@do... would need to go somewhere as well. These email-addresses are in the source at various places. It would "only" need a .forward server. Would it be possible to distinguish between web requests for dosemu.org (=>dosemu.sourceforge.net) and mail sent to that domain. There seem to exist MX records that can handle that. Bart |
From: Alistair M. <ali...@sl...> - 2002-03-26 17:41:49
|
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Bart Oldeman wrote: > dosemu-bugs: > archive is accessible for members only > anyone can post > subscription needs approval (from me) OK. Got the mail. I'm not sure if we will need dosemu-bugs to work like this in the future. Given we don't have a working GNATS setup, which was the original reason for the address, we might be better to move to the trakcing tools on SF now. At which point we can make the old address an auto-responder. The problem will be that the dosemu-bugs address is supposed to be on dosemu.org and SF.net will probably not accept that. We might still need to do some playing with the mail configurations. Alistair |
From: Bart O. <Bar...@br...> - 2002-03-26 17:22:35
|
Hi Hans and Alistair, after configuring with mailman - dosemu-devel: archive is accessible for members only only members can post subscription needs approval (from me) dosemu-bugs: archive is accessible for members only anyone can post subscription needs approval (from me) I hope you and I receive this and you agree with this. I have so far only added you to both mailing lists. Bart |