#11 test case 30 failure

[Anonymous]

Test case 30 fails. Not sure if its our installation but doesn't appear to be the kind of error that would be.

Possible that the severity of the error was changed in recent version.

Version: 0.69
OS: CentOS5 64-bit
HW: AMD 64 X2

------TC53
------TC30 (pause)
--- /tmp/expected.14524 2008-05-15 20:25:53.000000000 -0400
+++ - 2008-05-15 20:25:53.192977000 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-dktest: DK_STAT_CANTVRFY: Cannot get domain key to verify signature (temporary failure)
+dktest: DK_STAT_NOKEY: No public key available (permanent failure)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
DomainKey-Status: no key

[Nobody/Anonymous]

Logged In: NO

Further investigation:

It appears that the DK_STAT_CANTVRFY should NOT
be returned for that case. The test is incorrect
for the current crynwr.com NS configuration.

Both nameservers for the crynwr.com zone are happy
to report that the TXT record doesn't exist. In
order for the test to pass, the nons.crynwr.com
zone would have to be delegated and have invalid
name servers or similar problem.

-dub

[Nobody/Anonymous]

Logged In: NO

quite strange: now the nons.crynwr.com zone is
delegated to a non-routable nameserver and the
test passes.

-dub

[Steven Chamberlain]

Logged In: YES
user_id=1909512
Originator: NO

The test case involves a query for dog._domainkey.nons.crynwr.com, for which the DNS returns no records, rather than a server failure. I believe you're right, and that the 'more severe' NOKEY error is correct, and that the test probably wasn't updated.

[Steven Chamberlain]

Logged In: YES
user_id=1909512
Originator: NO

I've submitted my suggested patch to fix this is at:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2016022&group_id=107680&atid=648375

[Nobody/Anonymous]

Logged In: NO

ronaldinho_zapak@yahoo.co.in