From: engelbert g. <be...@ch...> - 2003-03-02 09:59:23
|
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Adam Chodorowski wrote: > Since I'm already muttering about the LaTeX writer, I thought I might as well > post a small wishlist. ;-) > > + A ``--stylesheet=<path>`` option, like the HTML writer has. Right now it is > hardcoded to ``style.tex`` in the current directory. In the README, there > are some references to ``--stylesheet-path``, but there is no such option in > reality. i see to it. have to consult handling in the html-writer first. and --include-stylesheet might be useful, so it must not be shipped. BTW: what is in your stylesheet ? > + A ``--no-stylesheet`` option. This could also be automatic: if the file that > is assumed to be the stylesheet (default ``style.tex``) is not found, do not > emit code to include it in the LaTeX file. It's a bit annoying that LaTeX > stops processing when it can't find ``style.tex`` when all you wanted was a > fast trial run... Q: the automatic part assumes the paths match. > > Also, there is the matter of some way to auto-select the right file for the > `image` and `figure` directives based on which writer is processing (EPS makes > sense for LaTeX, PNG or JPEG for HTML) but that's a more general wish for the > whole of docutils. Right now it can be hacked around in the Makefile by using > symlinks, but it's ugly... i use pdflatex which handles gifs, ... but this might give degraded output for hardcopies. -- engelbert gruber email: eng...@ss... |