From: Martin B. <m....@gm...> - 2011-12-16 19:13:14
|
[SourceForge.net] wrote & schrieb: >>Comment By: flying sheep (flying-sheep) >so, you used some unicode categories to extend the spec? >awesome, thats a great fix! Can somebody give a short example of what has been achieved? Thank you! Martin -- http://mbless.de |
From: Guenter M. <mi...@us...> - 2011-12-16 20:13:19
|
On 2011-12-16, Martin Bless wrote: > [SourceForge.net] wrote & schrieb: >>>Comment By: flying sheep (flying-sheep) >>so, you used some unicode categories to extend the spec? >>awesome, thats a great fix! > Can somebody give a short example of what has been achieved? Things like: '*emphasis*' "*emphasis*" Straight, ‘*emphasis*’ “*emphasis*” English, ..., « *emphasis* » ‹ *emphasis* › « *emphasis* » ‹ *emphasis* › « *emphasis* » ‹ *emphasis* › French, „*emphasis*“ ‚*emphasis*‘ »*emphasis*« ›*emphasis*‹ German, Czech, ..., „*emphasis*” «*emphasis*» Romanian, “*emphasis*„ ‘*emphasis*‚ Greek, 「*emphasis*」 『*emphasis*』traditional Chinese, ”*emphasis*” ’*emphasis*’ »*emphasis*» ›*emphasis*› Swedish, Finnish, „*emphasis*” ‚*emphasis*’ Polish, „*emphasis*” »*emphasis*« ’*emphasis*’ Hungarian, now work. See: docutils/test/test_parsers/test_rst/test_inline_markup.py for the complete picture. The problem was analyzed and the idea described in docutils/docs/dev/todo.txt prior to the implementation, so you can look it up in the SVN browser if you are interested in the details. Günter |