From: Stefan Merten <smerten@oe...> - 2008-11-10 18:29:05
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
@DaveK: I sent you this before more as a reminder for myself. But
since we wanted to move the discussion to the list I'll put it here.
May be there is an idea from someone here.
The following features I consider missing / need improvement in
* Mapping definition lists to ODF
I looked also for something like definition lists in ODF but there
seems to be no such beast indeed. At the moment the definition is
done using `blockindent`.
May be we could improve if we create a special style instead of
`blockindent`. So users can redirect it to something which suits them
* ``.. sectnum::`` / automatic numbering must be suppressed
Numbering is better left to OOo. May be with a command line option
controlling the exact behavior.
* ``.. contents::`` must be suppressed or handled properly
One option would be to recognize the directive and create the
respective ODF field. But I don't know the details of how to do this
May be should also come with a command line option controlling the
* ``.. target-notes::`` "core dumps"
A ``.. target-notes::`` directives stops the whole program with an
error. Did no investigation so far.
(I didn't try this for some time now - may be it's gone.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.