Re: [documancer] documancer without wxmozilla

[Vaclav S. <vac...@ma...>]

Hi,

Arnd Baecker wrote:
> I am using documancer very happily for more than a year now.
> Yesterday I made an update to the CVS version.
> Unfortunately, the new version uses xml.dom.ext
> which is not available.

Thanks, fixed now. The XML files created by Documancer are ugly if you=20
don't have PyXML installed, but at least it works.

> Do you know of an easy way of getting wxmozilla

Download, then ./configure && make && make install...

> In general I think that the need to install wxmozilla
> raises the barrier for using documancer.

Yes, I noticed that too. I'd like to bundle wxMozilla with the next=20
release.

> Of course, one can use the wxHtml backend,
> but this has several drawbacks

=2E..the biggest of them being that it's unusable for any serious work.

Regards,
Vaclav

=2D-=20
PGP key: 0x465264C9, available from http://pgp.mit.edu/