RE: [Docstring-develop] Contents problems

[Tony J I. (Tibs) <to...@ls...>]

Richard Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:38, David Goodger wrote:
> > All this browser-fiddling is outside my expertise and
> > interest. Anybody want to take it on?
>
> I'd say that for now it's not worth trying to force it. Worry
> about other stuff (like the nuking of the separate ReST CVS ;)

Not having seen the details of what you're discussing (and for reasons
too boring to go into, it's difficult for me to view PNG files at work),
I'd still agree.

The exact details of HTML representation can be left until later. After
all, you're unlikely to do anything more horrible than javadoc.

The important thing is to have *reasonable* output, and then people can
argue (!). But later on.

Tibs
--
Tony J Ibbs (Tibs)      http://www.tibsnjoan.co.uk/
Give a pedant an inch and they'll take 25.4mm
(once they've established you're talking a post-1959 inch, of course)
My views! Mine! Mine! (Unless Laser-Scan ask nicely to borrow them.)