#298 indexterm without primary

v5.1
closed-fixed
nobody
5
2013-02-19
2012-07-24
Shin ITANI
No

indexterm can have a secondary without a primary. Is this structure right?

docbook.rnc (current):
db.indexterm.contentmodel =
db.primary?,
((db.secondary,
((db.tertiary, (db.see | db.seealso+)?)
| db.see
| db.seealso+)?)
| db.see
| db.seealso+)?

docbook.rnc (corrected);
db.indexterm.contentmodel =
(db.primary,
((db.secondary,
((db.tertiary, (db.see | db.seealso+)?)
| db.see
| db.seealso+)?)
| db.see
| db.seealso+)?)?

Discussion

  • Mauritz Jeanson

    Mauritz Jeanson - 2012-10-21
    • labels: 788488 -->
     
  • Mauritz Jeanson

    Mauritz Jeanson - 2012-10-21
    • labels: --> DocBook XML
    • milestone: --> v5.1
     
  • Mauritz Jeanson

    Mauritz Jeanson - 2012-10-21

    Moving to RFEs tracker.

     
  • Norman Walsh

    Norman Walsh - 2012-10-21

    Indexterm is not allowed to have a secondary without a primary.

     
  • Shin ITANI

    Shin ITANI - 2012-10-21

    Yes, I think so that. But, indexterm is allowed to have a secondary without a primary now.
    Could you fix it?

     
  • Norman Walsh

    Norman Walsh - 2012-11-14
    • status: open --> open-fixed
     
  • Norman Walsh

    Norman Walsh - 2012-11-14

    Good catch. Fixed in 5.1

     
  • Robert Stayton

    Robert Stayton - 2013-02-19
    • status: open-fixed --> closed-fixed
     

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:





No, thanks