From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-02-27 04:10:27
|
Bugs item #1669601, was opened at 2007-02-27 02:04 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by dleidert You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1669601&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: XSL Group: output: print/FO/PDF Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Daniel Leidert (dleidert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: fo: Broken footnote-numbering with special ulink.* settings Initial Comment: Hello, Please consider the following case: Setting ulink.show='0' and ulink.footnotes='1' generating FO/PDF output, only real footnotes are output, but every link is counted too. That means, if you have first a (non-empty) ulink and then a footnote, only the latter is output as footnote, but with number '2', instead of '1'. I attached a test-case to reproduce the bug and the results. Process this page with the attached XSL to check yourself. I wasn't able to check against the snapshots, because there is something broken atm in fo/table.xsl (email was sent). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1669601&group_id=21935 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-04-04 17:04:43
|
Bugs item #1669601, was opened at 2007-02-27 02:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mzjn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1669601&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: XSL Group: output: print/FO/PDF >Status: Pending >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Daniel Leidert (dleidert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fo: Broken footnote-numbering with special ulink.* settings Initial Comment: Hello, Please consider the following case: Setting ulink.show='0' and ulink.footnotes='1' generating FO/PDF output, only real footnotes are output, but every link is counted too. That means, if you have first a (non-empty) ulink and then a footnote, only the latter is output as footnote, but with number '2', instead of '1'. I attached a test-case to reproduce the bug and the results. Process this page with the attached XSL to check yourself. I wasn't able to check against the snapshots, because there is something broken atm in fo/table.xsl (email was sent). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mauritz Jeanson (mzjn) Date: 2007-04-04 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=582041 Originator: NO The parameter documentation does not say so explicitly, but judging from the way it is implemented in xref.xsl, setting ulink.footnotes = 1 is not meaningful when ulink.show = 0. I have added [ulink.show != 0] to the "count" pattern in the template with match="footnote" and mode="footnote.number" (in footnote.xsl), which fixes the numbering in this case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1669601&group_id=21935 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-04-19 02:20:17
|
Bugs item #1669601, was opened at 2007-02-26 17:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1669601&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: XSL Group: output: print/FO/PDF >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Daniel Leidert (dleidert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fo: Broken footnote-numbering with special ulink.* settings Initial Comment: Hello, Please consider the following case: Setting ulink.show='0' and ulink.footnotes='1' generating FO/PDF output, only real footnotes are output, but every link is counted too. That means, if you have first a (non-empty) ulink and then a footnote, only the latter is output as footnote, but with number '2', instead of '1'. I attached a test-case to reproduce the bug and the results. Process this page with the attached XSL to check yourself. I wasn't able to check against the snapshots, because there is something broken atm in fo/table.xsl (email was sent). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2007-04-18 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1312539 Originator: NO This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mauritz Jeanson (mzjn) Date: 2007-04-04 10:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=582041 Originator: NO The parameter documentation does not say so explicitly, but judging from the way it is implemented in xref.xsl, setting ulink.footnotes = 1 is not meaningful when ulink.show = 0. I have added [ulink.show != 0] to the "count" pattern in the template with match="footnote" and mode="footnote.number" (in footnote.xsl), which fixes the numbering in this case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1669601&group_id=21935 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-08-21 06:30:27
|
Bugs item #1669601, was opened at 2007-02-27 12:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kyank You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1669601&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: XSL Group: output: print/FO/PDF Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Daniel Leidert (dleidert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fo: Broken footnote-numbering with special ulink.* settings Initial Comment: Hello, Please consider the following case: Setting ulink.show='0' and ulink.footnotes='1' generating FO/PDF output, only real footnotes are output, but every link is counted too. That means, if you have first a (non-empty) ulink and then a footnote, only the latter is output as footnote, but with number '2', instead of '1'. I attached a test-case to reproduce the bug and the results. Process this page with the attached XSL to check yourself. I wasn't able to check against the snapshots, because there is something broken atm in fo/table.xsl (email was sent). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kevin Yank (kyank) Date: 2007-08-21 16:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=402328 Originator: NO This fix has broken footnote numbering in general as of the 1.73.0 release! Instead of adding [ulink.show != 0], you should have added [$ulink.show != 0] (note the dollar sign!). Should I file a separate bug report for this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2007-04-19 12:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1312539 Originator: NO This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mauritz Jeanson (mzjn) Date: 2007-04-05 03:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=582041 Originator: NO The parameter documentation does not say so explicitly, but judging from the way it is implemented in xref.xsl, setting ulink.footnotes = 1 is not meaningful when ulink.show = 0. I have added [ulink.show != 0] to the "count" pattern in the template with match="footnote" and mode="footnote.number" (in footnote.xsl), which fixes the numbering in this case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1669601&group_id=21935 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-08-21 06:36:27
|
Bugs item #1669601, was opened at 2007-02-27 12:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kyank You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1669601&group_id=21935 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: XSL Group: output: print/FO/PDF Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Daniel Leidert (dleidert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fo: Broken footnote-numbering with special ulink.* settings Initial Comment: Hello, Please consider the following case: Setting ulink.show='0' and ulink.footnotes='1' generating FO/PDF output, only real footnotes are output, but every link is counted too. That means, if you have first a (non-empty) ulink and then a footnote, only the latter is output as footnote, but with number '2', instead of '1'. I attached a test-case to reproduce the bug and the results. Process this page with the attached XSL to check yourself. I wasn't able to check against the snapshots, because there is something broken atm in fo/table.xsl (email was sent). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kevin Yank (kyank) Date: 2007-08-21 16:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=402328 Originator: NO Separate bug report filed: bug 1778340 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kevin Yank (kyank) Date: 2007-08-21 16:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=402328 Originator: NO This fix has broken footnote numbering in general as of the 1.73.0 release! Instead of adding [ulink.show != 0], you should have added [$ulink.show != 0] (note the dollar sign!). Should I file a separate bug report for this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2007-04-19 12:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1312539 Originator: NO This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mauritz Jeanson (mzjn) Date: 2007-04-05 03:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=582041 Originator: NO The parameter documentation does not say so explicitly, but judging from the way it is implemented in xref.xsl, setting ulink.footnotes = 1 is not meaningful when ulink.show = 0. I have added [ulink.show != 0] to the "count" pattern in the template with match="footnote" and mode="footnote.number" (in footnote.xsl), which fixes the numbering in this case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1669601&group_id=21935 |