From: Alan S. <ala...@po...> - 2004-09-06 07:37:24
|
* Andrei Formiga (and...@gm...) wrote: > As it's somewhat complicated to mess with the current sources and > compile them to see the result, wouldn't it be better if we could have > an wiki for documenting the OCaml system ? Then, as the content gets > mature, it can be rendered in other formats. There's even an OCaml > wiki now, we'd need only a host (or we could try a php wiki and go > with sourceforge). >=20 > What do you think ? This is a great idea, and I'm 100 % for it. Unless it makes things too=20 complex, we should definitely try to use the ocaml wiki=20 (http://sandbox.merjis.com/). I might also be able to find a box to use=20 as a server at INRIA (we have an Apache 2.0 running, I'd need to install=20 the rest of the software ... this is on a Fedora Core 2, which I do not=20 know at all though). I'm going to try to investigate this, see if I can get it installed. =20 I'll let you know. Thanks for suggesting this. Alan Schmitt --=20 The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen. =2EO. =2E.O OOO |