From: Hiren P. <hir...@gm...> - 2010-05-13 07:26:51
|
On Wed, 12 May 2010 16:35:59 -0400 Max <per...@we...> wrote: > > personally not as yet, but I'm confident that it will work, core hasn't changed enough to break neb module support. > > we like what dnx does, and were thinking of bringing those features into the core, instead of neb modules, as a default way of icinga doing checks. > > if we were to do this, we'd definitely prefer dnx developers joining in, instead of constantly watching for developments in dnx and then bringing those back info icinga. > > that was the reason I thought I'd see what the dnx developers think. > > thanks for the replies thus far. > > So you want the DNX team to stop doing this as a NEB module and make > it just be a part of Icinga core so that Nagios core and Nagios core > related projects then cannot use it? > > That sounds like a very politically motivated move and I would suggest > not doing it, having DNX usable by just Icinga will only make a number > of people mad at the Icinga team. > > I'd suggest maintaining NEB compatibility and just having Icinga > developers contribute to DNX instead. > okay fair enough. thanks for the responses. |