From: Alex D. <Al...@no...> - 2012-08-07 08:19:15
|
On 7 Aug 2012, at 00:11, Brian Wellington wrote: > There's no way that I know of to replace dnsjava's underlying socket code with something that doesn't use Channels, so I don't think there's a good way to work around this. It's worth noting that dnsjnio replaces the dnsjava socket implementation with an nio implementation. This does still use Channels, and I haven't tested it against this issue. However, it might still be worth a look. Thanks, Alex. |