Re: Patch for two issues

[Kocik, W. <wk...@ve...>]

In this case, I¹ve clearly misunderstood the purpose of sendAsync(). I was
using it to send NOTIFY messages to a group of slave name servers, and when
it was discovered that it was only sending to the first name server on the
list, this was the ³fix² I implemented.

Is there some built-in mechanism to send a message to a bunch of name
servers (synchronously, now that I think of it) or should I thread that on
my own?

> On 7/22/10 1:18 PM, "Brian Wellington" <bwe...@xb...> wrote:
> 
>> 1. ExtendedResolver.java ­ sendAsync() was not using its multiple resolvers
>> to send a message, only the first one on the array.
> This is the intended behavior.  Multiple requests will be sent if necessary
> (that is, if the first request fails or times out), but in the normal case, a
> single request sent using the first resolver (or a random resolver if
> setLoadBalance() has been called) is sufficient.
> 
> Brian
> 




-- 
Bill