From: Jack T. <j.t...@F5...> - 2009-05-07 14:16:44
|
Thanks. I saw that about 30 seconds after I posted my email. Thank you. -- Jack Tavares ________________________________________ From: Olafur Gudmundsson [og...@og...] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 17:13 To: Jack Tavares; dns...@li... Subject: Re: DSRecord uses base16 encoding, while DNSKEYRecord uses base 64... Yes, base16 is defined for DS digest in RFC4034 section 5.3 DNSKEY public key is base64 as defined in RFC4034 section 2.2 Olafur At 09:23 07/05/2009, Jack Tavares wrote: >Content-Language: en-US >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > >boundary="_000_4B18A8F75A6384449755BC7784073E93603B776C29exch11olympus_" > >I had assumed that DSRecord would use the same encoding for >the digest as DNSKEYRecord uses for the key. > >Is base16 the correct encoding there? > >Thanks > > >-- >Jack Tavares >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your >production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to >Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 >Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image >processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com >_______________________________________________ >dnsjava-users mailing list >dns...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dnsjava-users |