Re: [Dle-develop] [PATCH RESEND] avoid swapping out with swappiness==0

[Jerome M. <jma...@re...>]

On 05/23/2012 10:41 PM, Satoru Moriya wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> This patch has been reviewed for couple of months.
> 
> This patch *only* improves the behavior when the kernel has
> enough filebacked pages. It means that it does not change
> the behavior when kernel has small number of filebacked pages.
> 
> Kosaki-san pointed out that the threshold which we use
> to decide whether filebacked page is enough or not is not
> appropriate(*).
> 
> (*) http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg32380.html
> 
> As I described in (**), I believe that threshold discussion
> should be done in other thread because it affects not only
> swappiness=0 case and the kernel behave the same way with
> or without this patch below the threshold.
> 
> (**) http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg34317.html
> 
> The patch may not be perfect but, at least, we can improve
> the kernel behavior in the enough filebacked memory case
> with this patch. I believe it's better than nothing.
> 
> Do you have any comments about it?
> 
> NOTE: I updated the patch with Acked-by tags
> 
> ---
> Sometimes we'd like to avoid swapping out anonymous memory
> in particular, avoid swapping out pages of important process or
> process groups while there is a reasonable amount of pagecache
> on RAM so that we can satisfy our customers' requirements.
> 
> OTOH, we can control how aggressive the kernel will swap memory pages
> with /proc/sys/vm/swappiness for global and
> /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/memory.swappiness for each memcg.
> 
> But with current reclaim implementation, the kernel may swap out
> even if we set swappiness==0 and there is pagecache on RAM.
> 
> This patch changes the behavior with swappiness==0. If we set
> swappiness==0, the kernel does not swap out completely
> (for global reclaim until the amount of free pages and filebacked
> pages in a zone has been reduced to something very very small
> (nr_free + nr_filebacked < high watermark)).
> 
> Any comments are welcome.
> 
> Regards,
> Satoru Moriya
> 
> Signed-off-by: Satoru Moriya <sat...@hd...>
> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <mi...@ke...>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <ri...@re...>
> 

Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jma...@re...>