|
From: Rik v. R. <ri...@re...> - 2012-05-07 20:10:13
|
On 04/26/2012 11:41 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Richard Davies > <ric...@el...> wrote: >> Satoru Moriya wrote: >>>> I have run into problems with heavy swapping with swappiness==0 and >>>> was pointed to this thread ( >>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=133522782307215 ) >>> >>> Did you test this patch with your workload? >> >> I haven't yet tested this patch. It takes a long time since these are >> production machines, and the bug itself takes several weeks of production >> use to really show up. >> >> Rik van Riel has pointed out a lot of VM tweaks that he put into 3.4: >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=133536506926326 >> >> My intention is to reboot half of our machines into plain 3.4 once it is >> out, and half onto 3.4 + your patch. >> >> Then we can compare behaviour. >> >> Will your patch apply cleanly on 3.4? > > Note. This patch doesn't solve your issue. This patch mean, > when occuring very few swap io, it change to 0. But you said > you are seeing eager swap io. As Dave already pointed out, your > machine have buffer head issue. > > So, this thread is pointless. Running KVM guests directly off block devices results in a lot of buffer cache. I suspect that this patch will in fact fix Richard's issue. The patch is small, fairly simple and looks like it will fix people's problems. It also makes swappiness=0 behave the way most people seem to imagine it would work. If it works for a few people (test results), I believe we might as well merge it. Yes, for cgroups we may need additional logic, but we can sort that out as we go along. -- All rights reversed |