Re: [DL-Learner discussion] Null Pointer Exception in FastInstanceChecker.java:202 - Revision 3518: /branches/1.0.1

[An C. T. <tca...@gm...>]

Hello Jens,

Thanks for your kind offer. I am very please to have contribution on 
your framework. However, I am currently doing some experiments with my 
idea and will come back with your offer later if it works :-)

About the problem, I checked out the head revision from the trunk but it 
could not work as described. Revision of the interface package is 3522 
as you said but the subpackage interface.confparser is still at revision 
2322. I just downloaded the head version and tried to get it works 
without making any changes.

Would you like to check it again.

Thank you so much.

Cheers,
An.


On 3/01/12 10:21 PM, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> Hello An,
>
> it seems that you are using a mixture of new and old code in your local
> version of DL-Learner. Note that we performed many significant changes
> in the last year, so using an older version of the conf parser in
> combination with new algorithms etc. won't work. Please try to do a
> clean fresh SVN checkout of DL-Learner trunk and then verify whether the
> problem still exists.
>
> Note that the current SVN revision is 3522 (as of 10pm CET today). If
> your confparser package is from revision 2322, then that is from
> December 2010, which is before the change of the conf file syntax
> announced in the DL-Learner-1.0-alpha-1 release. That would explain the
> problems you get. You can subscribe to
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dl-learner-svn to always
> get the latest SVN changes, which will help you to stay up to date.
>
> > From your questions, it seems that you perform non-trivial changes or
> additions to DL-Learner. In that case, it may be useful for our research
> groups to work more closely together. If we do this, then I could give
> you developer access to DL-Learner and you could perform your changes in
> a separate branch, which you could synchronise with the trunk
> occasionally (or eventually we could move them to the trunk itself).
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jens
>