Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libmilter question re: socket permissions

[Murray S. K. <ms...@se...>]

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Mike Markley wrote:
> Given the detail above, SM's patch + umask seems like it should do the 
> trick nicely. (From a purely selfish perspective: I'm not building with 
> _FFR_QUERY_CACHE, so even if that isn't forced to 0600, it's not a 
> problem here.)

0600 would be appropriate anyway; there's no legitimate reason for any 
other process to gain access to that cache.