From: deiva s. <chi...@gm...> - 2009-06-17 02:59:43
|
Hi, >> When relaxed body canonicalization is adopted, in case of body with only >>empty lines[more than 1], all these empty lines will be removed [as acc. to >>RFC , all the trailing empty lines need to be removed] and the body is >>signed.[Basically a body hash for 0 length is generated]. Am i right?? >> >>I made use of dkim-milter to sign mails. When my body of the mail has >>only empty lines, libdkim signs the body for CRLF character (l=2), in case >>of relaxed canonicalization. Is this the expected behaviour ? >> >>Please help me in this issue. Could someone help on this issue please ?? Thanks, Deiva Shanmugam On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:37 PM, < dki...@li...> wrote: > Send dkim-milter-discuss mailing list submissions to > dki...@li... > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > dki...@li... > > You can reach the person managing the list at > dki...@li... > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of dkim-milter-discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Issue with relaxed Body canonicalization (deiva shanmugam) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:37:19 +0530 > From: deiva shanmugam <chi...@gm...> > Subject: [dkim-milter-discuss] Issue with relaxed Body > canonicalization > To: dki...@li... > Message-ID: > <acc...@ma...> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > > When relaxed body canonicalization is adopted, in case of body with only > empty lines[more than 1], all these empty lines will be removed [as acc. to > RFC , all the trailing empty lines need to be removed] and the body is > signed.[Basically a body hash for 0 length is generated]. Am i right?? > > I made use of dkim-milter to sign mails. When my body of the mail has only > empty lines, libdkim signs the body for CRLF character (l=2), in case of > relaxed canonicalization. Is this the expected behaviour ? > > Please help me in this issue. > > Thanks, > Deiva Shanmugam > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:37 PM, < > dki...@li...> wrote: > > > Send dkim-milter-discuss mailing list submissions to > > dki...@li... > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > dki...@li... > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > dki...@li... > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of dkim-milter-discuss digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. Re: Unsuccessful verification status for space between header > > field name and colon. (SM) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:36:20 -0700 > > From: SM <sm...@re...> > > Subject: Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unsuccessful verification status > > for space between header field name and colon. > > To: dkim-milter general discussion > > <dki...@li...> > > Message-ID: <6.2...@re...> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > > > Hi Deiva, > > At 03:32 09-06-2009, deiva shanmugam wrote: > > >The headers that are being signed are: > > > > [snip] > > > > >Subject :Space after colon > > > > I guess you mean space before the colon. > > > > >The DKIM-Signature generated: > > > > > >DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > > >d=<http://lax.qa.juno.com>lax.qa.juno.com; > > > > As the canonicalization is relaxed, the space will be removed. > > > > >Observation: When the headers are signed using relaxed > > >canonicalization, the Verification status by Gmail - "hardfail" and > > >AOL - "Fail". > > > > > >If simple canonicalization is observed,then successful verification > > >by Gmail and AOL. > > > > That points to a problem when using relaxed canonicalization. > > > > Can you send me a DKIM-signed email to demonstrate the above problem > > off-list? > > > > Regards, > > -sm > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial > > Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited > > royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing > > server and web deployment. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dkim-milter-discuss mailing list > > dki...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss > > > > > > End of dkim-milter-discuss Digest, Vol 36, Issue 4 > > ************************************************** > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > ------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial > Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited > royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing > server and web deployment. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > dkim-milter-discuss mailing list > dki...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss > > > End of dkim-milter-discuss Digest, Vol 36, Issue 5 > ************************************************** > |