From: Kamran H. <km...@gm...> - 2005-07-14 01:03:55
|
Hi, I'm getting the following error when I install dkim....(note: I have installed ssl and libmilter.a) 3 of 3 tests completed successfully 6 of 6 tests completed successfully ============================================================ cc -O2 -I. -I../../include -DNEWDB -c -o t-cf.o t-cf.c cc -o t-cf t-cf.o libsm.a -ldb -lresolv -lcrypt -lnsl -ldl cc -O2 -I. -I../../include -DNEWDB -c -o b-strcmp.o b-strcmp.c cc -o b-strcmp b-strcmp.o libsm.a -ldb -lresolv -lcrypt -lnsl -ldl make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/dkim-milter-0.1.0/obj.Linux.2.4.21-27.EL.i686/libsm' cc -O2 -I. -I../../include -I/usr/local/ssl/include -I../libdkim/ -I/usr/include -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -c -o dkim-filter.o dkim-filter.c cc -O2 -I. -I../../include -I/usr/local/ssl/include -I../libdkim/ -I/usr/include -D_REENTRANT -DXP_MT -c -o util.o util.c cc -o dkim-filter -lpthread -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -L/usr/lib dkim-filter.o util.o -lmilter /root/dkim-milter-0.1.0/obj.Linux.2.4.21-27.EL.i686/libsm/libsm.a /root/dkim-milter-0.1.0/obj.Linux.2.4.21-27.EL.i686/libdkim/libdkim.a -ldb -lresolv -lcrypt -lnsl -ldl -lssl -lcrypto dkim-filter.o(.text+0x146f): In function `mlfi_eom': : undefined reference to `smfi_insheader' dkim-filter.o(.text+0x1535): In function `mlfi_eom': : undefined reference to `smfi_insheader' dkim-filter.o(.text+0x178e): In function `mlfi_eom': : undefined reference to `smfi_insheader' dkim-filter.o(.text+0x2577): In function `main': : undefined reference to `smfi_opensocket' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [dkim-filter] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/dkim-milter-0.1.0/obj.Linux.2.4.21-27.EL.i686/dkim-filter' make: *** [all] Error 2 Thanks, Kamran |
From: Murray S. K. <ms...@se...> - 2005-07-14 16:28:02
|
Please subscribe to dkim-milter-discuss to get future replies. On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Kamran Habib wrote: > I'm getting the following error when I install dkim....(note: I have > installed ssl and libmilter.a) > [...] > dkim-filter.o(.text+0x146f): In > function `mlfi_eom': > : undefined reference to `smfi_insheader' > dkim-filter.o(.text+0x1535): In function `mlfi_eom': > : undefined reference to `smfi_insheader' > dkim-filter.o(.text+0x178e): In function `mlfi_eom': > : undefined reference to `smfi_insheader' > dkim-filter.o(.text+0x2577): In function `main': > : undefined reference to `smfi_opensocket' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[1]: *** [dkim-filter] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/root/dkim-milter-0.1.0/obj.Linux.2.4.21-27.EL.i686/dkim-filter' > make: *** [all] Error 2 Your libmilter is too old, and doesn't have some required code that was added to support the sender authentication efforts. Please upgrade to sendmail 8.13.0 or later. |
From: Jim F. <jf...@bl...> - 2005-07-14 23:12:04
|
Murray, Given that prepending the DKIM-Signature header is only a SHOULD in the DKIM specification, would it make sense to add a compilation option to allow it to be built for sendmail 8.12? -Jim On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:27, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Please subscribe to dkim-milter-discuss to get future replies. > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Kamran Habib wrote: > > I'm getting the following error when I install dkim....(note: I have > > installed ssl and libmilter.a) > > [...] > > dkim-filter.o(.text+0x146f): In > > function `mlfi_eom': > > : undefined reference to `smfi_insheader' > > dkim-filter.o(.text+0x1535): In function `mlfi_eom': > > : undefined reference to `smfi_insheader' > > dkim-filter.o(.text+0x178e): In function `mlfi_eom': > > : undefined reference to `smfi_insheader' > > dkim-filter.o(.text+0x2577): In function `main': > > : undefined reference to `smfi_opensocket' > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > make[1]: *** [dkim-filter] Error 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory > > `/root/dkim-milter-0.1.0/obj.Linux.2.4.21-27.EL.i686/dkim-filter' > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > Your libmilter is too old, and doesn't have some required code that was > added to support the sender authentication efforts. > > Please upgrade to sendmail 8.13.0 or later. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > dkim-milter-discuss mailing list > dki...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss |
From: Murray S. K. <ms...@se...> - 2005-07-14 23:19:09
|
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Jim Fenton wrote: > Given that prepending the DKIM-Signature header is only a SHOULD in the > DKIM specification, would it make sense to add a compilation option to > allow it to be built for sendmail 8.12? Yeah, not an unreasonable request. Do you want to create an RFE for it? |
From: Jim F. <jf...@bl...> - 2005-07-15 04:16:47
|
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 16:18, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Jim Fenton wrote: > > Given that prepending the DKIM-Signature header is only a SHOULD in the > > DKIM specification, would it make sense to add a compilation option to > > allow it to be built for sendmail 8.12? > > Yeah, not an unreasonable request. > > Do you want to create an RFE for it? Sure. RFE #1238617. -Jim |
From: Kamran H. <km...@gm...> - 2005-07-16 00:55:02
|
Hi Murray, Is the output format generated by the gentxt.csh correct? This is the output I get: $./gentxt.csh <selector> example.com *<selector>._domainkey* IN TXT "v=DKIM1.0; *a=rsa-sha1*; t=y; p=MFwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADSwAwSAJBAKC8+lnWUbG/AKdlg6FDlVL0sxYicRs0RccB3aSqioLPCe WqqRLA5jA21Y7UajoewUugAQqUeYyukYNP4xLdcAECAwEAAQ==" ; Shouldn't it be of the format: *<selector>._domainkey.example.com.* IN TXT "g=; *k=rsa*; t=y; p=MEwwPQRJKoZIhvcNADAQCQADOwAwOAIxANPpYHdE2tevfEpvL1Tk2dDYv0pF28/f5MxU83x/0b sn4R4p7waPaz1IbOGs/6bm5QIDAQAB" I believer "a=" tag was not in the final draft. -Kamran |
From: Murray S. K. <ms...@se...> - 2005-07-18 20:31:19
|
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Kamran Habib wrote: > Hi Murray, > > Is the output format generated by the gentxt.csh correct? This is the output > I get: > > $./gentxt.csh <selector> example.com > > *<selector>._domainkey* IN TXT "v=DKIM1.0; *a=rsa-sha1*; t=y; > p=MFwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADSwAwSAJBAKC8+lnWUbG/AKdlg6FDlVL0sxYicRs0RccB3aSqioLPCe > WqqRLA5jA21Y7UajoewUugAQqUeYyukYNP4xLdcAECAwEAAQ==" ; > > Shouldn't it be of the format: > > *<selector>._domainkey.example.com.* IN TXT "g=; *k=rsa*; t=y; > p=MEwwPQRJKoZIhvcNADAQCQADOwAwOAIxANPpYHdE2tevfEpvL1Tk2dDYv0pF28/f5MxU83x/0b > sn4R4p7waPaz1IbOGs/6bm5QIDAQAB" > > I believer "a=" tag was not in the final draft. Oops, quite right. I'll update it now. In fact the v= part is wrong as well. |