From: <pu...@we...> - 2005-08-03 10:56:32
|
Now i think i already know the answer, but would like someone to confirm. i am running a mail server with mailscanner as my spam and virus filter. i have just installed dk-milter and the emails get signed as expected. unfortunately they always fail. this is more than likely due to the fact that the mails get signed and then mailscanner adds it's scan headers, etc. i am assuming this step will make the signature invalid! anyone using dk-milter in combination with mailscanner? Cheers pj ------------------ www.websavages.com |
From: Jose A. A. <Jos...@vi...> - 2005-08-24 19:04:52
|
Hi all I folloied thread previous, however I did not get success. They had obtained to implement? Regards JOse ---------- Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus/antispam Viacom ®, Scan engine v4.4.00 for Linux. Virus data file v4566 created Aug 24 2005 Scanning for 145253 viruses, trojans and variants. |
From: SM <sm...@re...> - 2005-08-24 20:30:22
|
Hi Jose, At 12:00 24-08-2005, Jose A. Alves wrote: >I folloied thread previous, however I did not get success. >They had obtained to implement? I'm waiting for feedback from PJ. We'll post to the list once we get it implemented. Regards, -sm |
From: R-ealitY <R-e...@vi...> - 2005-08-24 20:46:43
|
Hi > Hi Jose, > > I'm waiting for feedback from PJ. We'll post to the list once we > get it implemented. > ok, I will be intent. tanks Regards JOse ---------- Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus/antispam Viacom ®, Scan engine v4.4.00 for Linux. Virus data file v4566 created Aug 24 2005 Scanning for 145253 viruses, trojans and variants. |
From: <pu...@we...> - 2005-08-25 10:46:42
|
Just to give everyone a heads up as to what's going on my side. I've been investigating my mailscanner configuration and it turns out that if I just have the one sendmail process running emails are received, scanned and delivered. This would probably explain why sm & I haven't been able to implement the signing of outgoing email messages. This really has me stumpe= d!! anyway on with the show... Cheers PJ Quoting R-ealitY <R-e...@vi...>: > Hi >> Hi Jose, >> >> I'm waiting for feedback from PJ. We'll post to the list once we >> get it implemented. >> > ok, I will be intent. > tanks > > Regards > JOse > > > ---------- > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antiv=EDrus/antispam Viacom = =AE, > Scan engine v4.4.00 for Linux. > Virus data file v4566 created Aug 24 2005 > Scanning for 145253 viruses, trojans and variants. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practic= es > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & Q= A > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > dk-milter-discuss mailing list > dk-...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dk-milter-discuss > ------------------ www.websavages.com |
From: SM <sm...@re...> - 2005-08-25 21:08:08
|
Hi PJ, At 03:45 25-08-2005, pu...@we... wrote: >I've been investigating my mailscanner configuration and it turns >out that if I >just have the one sendmail process running emails are received, scanned and >delivered. This would probably explain why sm & I haven't been able to >implement the signing of outgoing email messages. This really has me stumped!! I installed Mailscanner to test the whole process. You should be able to sign outgoing email with the following setup. I did not use dk-milter for the test. I am assuming that the system is set up as follows: 192.0.2.1 IP address assigned by your ISP. 10.18.12.4 IP address used for the smarthost. The mc file used to generate the sendmail.cf should contain the following options: define(`SMART_HOST',`[10.18.12.4]')dnl define(`confDELIVERY_MODE', `queueonly')dnl define(`QUEUE_DIR', `/var/spool/mqueue.in')dnl define(`confDONT_PROBE_INTERFACES',`True')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=192.0.2.1, Name=MTA')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`dk-filter', `S=inet:9981@localhost') The above configuration will be used for inbound mail and for DK verification. sendmail is started with the -bd -L sm-mta parameters The mc file used to generate the smarthost.cf should contain the following options: define(`QUEUE_DIR', `/var/spool/mqueue.smarthost')dnl define(`confPID_FILE'/var/run/sendmail-smarthost.pid')dnl define(`confDONT_PROBE_INTERFACES',`True')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=10.18.12.4, Name=SMARTMTA')dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`dk-filter', `S=inet:9982@localhost') This configuration will be used for the smartmart and for DK signing. sendmail is started with the -bd -L sm-mta -C/etc/mail/smarthost.cf parameters The third sendmail process is started with sendmail -q5 OPidFile=/var/run/sendmail-outbound.pid -OQueueDirectory=/var/spool/mqueue Your MailScanner.conf file should set the following options as: Incoming Queue Dir = /var/spool/mqueue.in Outgoing Queue Dir = /var/spool/mqueue Please see whether the above works for you. Regards, -sm |
From: Jose A. A. <Jos...@vi...> - 2005-08-25 21:46:15
|
Hi SM > > I installed Mailscanner to test the whole process. You should be > able to sign outgoing email with the following setup. I did not use > dk-milter for the test. > in the dawn I will try again ... > > define(`SMART_HOST',`[10.18.12.4]')dnl > define(`confDELIVERY_MODE', `queueonly')dnl > define(`QUEUE_DIR', `/var/spool/mqueue.in')dnl > define(`confDONT_PROBE_INTERFACES',`True')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=192.0.2.1, Name=MTA')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')dnl > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`dk-filter', `S=inet:9981@localhost') > > The above configuration will be used for inbound mail and for DK verification. > > sendmail is started with the -bd -L sm-mta parameters > here I would use: dk-filter -l -p inet:8891@localhost -u dkuser -b v > The mc file used to generate the smarthost.cf should contain the > following options: > > define(`QUEUE_DIR', `/var/spool/mqueue.smarthost')dnl > define(`confPID_FILE'/var/run/sendmail-smarthost.pid')dnl > define(`confDONT_PROBE_INTERFACES',`True')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=10.18.12.4, Name=SMARTMTA')dnl > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`dk-filter', `S=inet:9982@localhost') > > This configuration will be used for the smartmart and for DK signing. > > sendmail is started with the -bd -L sm-mta -C/etc/mail/smarthost.cf >parameters here I would use: dk-filter -l -p inet:8892@localhost -d dominio.com -c simple -s /path/to/pem -S selector -u dkuser -b s -i (filename contains 10.18.12.4) this correct one? Regards JOse ---------- Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus/antispam Viacom ®, Scan engine v4.4.00 for Linux. Virus data file v4567 created Aug 25 2005 Scanning for 145369 viruses, trojans and variants. |
From: SM <sm...@re...> - 2005-08-25 22:15:59
|
Hi Jose, At 14:41 25-08-2005, Jose A. Alves wrote: >here I would use: > dk-filter -l -p inet:8891@localhost -u dkuser -b v This will do the DK verification. >here I would use: > dk-filter -l -p inet:8892@localhost -d dominio.com -c simple -s > /path/to/pem -S selector -u dkuser -b s -i (filename contains 10.18.12.4) > >this correct one? Yes. I used 10.18.12.4 as an example. If your smarthost is listening on a different IP address, edit your configuration accordingly. You are using different port numbers for the dk-filters. You will have to change that setting in the mc examples I gave earlier. Regards, -sm |
From: <pu...@we...> - 2005-08-25 22:11:57
|
right o' i'll give it a go tonight (gmt+10) Cheers PJ Quoting SM <sm...@re...>: > Hi PJ, > At 03:45 25-08-2005, pu...@we... wrote: >> I've been investigating my mailscanner configuration and it turns >> out that if I >> just have the one sendmail process running emails are received, scanned and >> delivered. This would probably explain why sm & I haven't been able to >> implement the signing of outgoing email messages. This really has me >> stumped!! > > I installed Mailscanner to test the whole process. You should be > able to sign outgoing email with the following setup. I did not use > dk-milter for the test. > > I am assuming that the system is set up as follows: > > 192.0.2.1 IP address assigned by your ISP. > > 10.18.12.4 IP address used for the smarthost. > > The mc file used to generate the sendmail.cf should contain the > following options: > > define(`SMART_HOST',`[10.18.12.4]')dnl > define(`confDELIVERY_MODE', `queueonly')dnl > define(`QUEUE_DIR', `/var/spool/mqueue.in')dnl > define(`confDONT_PROBE_INTERFACES',`True')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=192.0.2.1, Name=MTA')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')dnl > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`dk-filter', `S=inet:9981@localhost') > > The above configuration will be used for inbound mail and for DK > verification. > > sendmail is started with the -bd -L sm-mta parameters > > The mc file used to generate the smarthost.cf should contain the > following options: > > define(`QUEUE_DIR', `/var/spool/mqueue.smarthost')dnl > define(`confPID_FILE'/var/run/sendmail-smarthost.pid')dnl > define(`confDONT_PROBE_INTERFACES',`True')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=10.18.12.4, Name=SMARTMTA')dnl > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`dk-filter', `S=inet:9982@localhost') > > This configuration will be used for the smartmart and for DK signing. > > sendmail is started with the -bd -L sm-mta -C/etc/mail/smarthost.cf > parameters > > The third sendmail process is started with > > sendmail -q5 OPidFile=/var/run/sendmail-outbound.pid > -OQueueDirectory=/var/spool/mqueue > > Your MailScanner.conf file should set the following options as: > > Incoming Queue Dir = /var/spool/mqueue.in > Outgoing Queue Dir = /var/spool/mqueue > > Please see whether the above works for you. > > Regards, > -sm ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > dk-milter-discuss mailing list > dk-...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dk-milter-discuss > ------------------ www.websavages.com |
From: Jose A. A. <Jos...@vi...> - 2005-08-26 05:57:22
|
Hi sm unhappyly I did not get success. also without using the MailScanner, the verifications give errors returns: dk-filter[15294]: j7LKOThg015292: signature verification failed Milter insert (1): header: Authentication-Results: domainkeys=permerror (bad format) much thankful by the attention I will try to implement another hour with calmer Regards, JOse On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:15:06 -0700, SM wrote > Hi Jose, > At 14:41 25-08-2005, Jose A. Alves wrote: > > >here I would use: > > dk-filter -l -p inet:8891@localhost -u dkuser -b v > > This will do the DK verification. > > >here I would use: > > dk-filter -l -p inet:8892@localhost -d dominio.com -c simple -s > > /path/to/pem -S selector -u dkuser -b s -i (filename contains 10.18.12.4) > > > >this correct one? > > Yes. I used 10.18.12.4 as an example. If your smarthost is > listening on a different IP address, edit your configuration > accordingly. You are using different port numbers for the > dk-filters. You will have to change that setting in the mc examples > I gave earlier. > > Regards, > -sm > ---------- Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus/antispam Viacom ®, Scan engine v4.4.00 for Linux. Virus data file v4567 created Aug 25 2005 Scanning for 145369 viruses, trojans and variants. |
From: SM <sm...@re...> - 2005-08-26 14:20:36
|
Hi Jose, At 22:52 25-08-2005, Jose A. Alves wrote: >unhappyly I did not get success. > >also without using the MailScanner, >the verifications give errors returns: > >dk-filter[15294]: j7LKOThg015292: signature verification failed Please post the extracts of the maillog together with the mail headers. It will help in identifying the problem. Regards, -sm |
From: <pu...@we...> - 2005-08-26 23:00:20
|
Well, I implemented your suggestion and the following log entry confirms that it still doesn't work. It's as if the outgoing mail is not being passes on to the smart host Cheers PJ Aug 27 08:42:00 piglet sm-mta[32288]: j7QMfws6032288: from=<************@yahoo.co.uk>, size=1058, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200...@we...>, proto=SMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=web26607.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.176.57] Aug 27 08:42:01 piglet sm-mta[32288]: j7QMfws6032288: Milter insert (1): header: Authentication-Results: piglet.websavages.com From=************@yahoo.co.uk; domainkeys=pass Aug 27 08:42:02 piglet MailScanner[32270]: New Batch: Scanning 1 messages, 1672 bytes Aug 27 08:42:07 piglet MailScanner[32270]: Virus and Content Scanning: Starting Aug 27 08:42:08 piglet MailScanner[32270]: Uninfected: Delivered 1 messages Aug 27 08:42:08 piglet MailScanner[32270]: Database ping failure attempting to re-connect Aug 27 08:42:08 piglet MailScanner[32270]: Initialising database connection Aug 27 08:42:08 piglet MailScanner[32270]: Finished initialising database connection Aug 27 08:45:03 piglet sendmail[32363]: j7QMfws6032288: to=<pu...@we...>, delay=00:03:04, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=local, pri=121058, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent Aug 27 08:46:22 piglet sendmail[32419]: j7QMkMSF032419: from=pu...@we..., size=1118, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200...@we...>, relay=apache@localhost Aug 27 08:46:22 piglet sm-mta[32420]: j7QMkM1C032420: from=<pu...@we...>, size=1280, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200...@we...>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] Aug 27 08:46:22 piglet sm-mta[32420]: j7QMkM1C032420: to=<************@yahoo.co.uk>, delay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=31280, stat=queued Aug 27 08:46:22 piglet sendmail[32419]: j7QMkMSF032419: to=************@yahoo.co.uk, ctladdr=pu...@we... (30/30), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=31118, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (j7QMkM1C032420 Message accepted for delivery) Aug 27 08:46:23 piglet MailScanner[32253]: New Batch: Scanning 1 messages, 1814 bytes Aug 27 08:46:25 piglet MailScanner[32253]: Virus and Content Scanning: Starting Aug 27 08:46:26 piglet MailScanner[32253]: Uninfected: Delivered 1 messages Aug 27 08:46:26 piglet MailScanner[32253]: Database ping failure attempting to re-connect Aug 27 08:46:26 piglet MailScanner[32253]: Initialising database connection Aug 27 08:46:26 piglet MailScanner[32253]: Finished initialising database connection Aug 27 08:50:06 piglet sendmail[32491]: j7QMkM1C032420: to=<************@yahoo.co.uk>, ctladdr=<pu...@we...> (505/505), delay=00:03:44, xdelay=00:00:03, mailer=esmtp, pri=121280, relay=mx1.mail.ukl.yahoo.com. [195.50.106.7], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (ok dirdel) ------------------ www.websavages.com |
From: SM <sm...@re...> - 2005-08-27 17:26:35
|
Hi PJ, At 15:56 26-08-2005, pu...@we... wrote: >Well, I implemented your suggestion and the following log entry >confirms that it >still doesn't work. It's as if the outgoing mail is not being passes on to the >smart host It should work. :) I have tested the sendmail part over here and the mail goes through the smarthost. Please email me the details of your setup. I am not using any of your scripts in the example I posted. You will have to tweak that part if you want to use your startup script. Regards, -sm |
From: <pu...@we...> - 2005-08-27 06:01:50
|
"It's life Jim but not as we know it!" I've got something working that resembles a working system. I had to think outside the box with this one, but I now have an email system which veryfies incoming dk signed messages and then scans them for spam, and more importantly, i can send messages which get sign by dk (albeit without the outoing spam and virus scans) I shall write a how-to tonight (specific to my system :( ) and share it with you for comments, suggestions etc... Cheers PJ p.s. how does my signature look? ------------------ www.websavages.com |
From: SM <sm...@re...> - 2005-08-27 20:16:01
|
Hi PJ, At 23:01 26-08-2005, pu...@we... wrote: >I've got something working that resembles a working system. I had to think >outside the box with this one, but I now have an email system which veryfies >incoming dk signed messages and then scans them for spam, and more >importantly, >i can send messages which get sign by dk (albeit without the outoing spam and >virus scans) I see that the DK signing is being done on your system. BTW, mail going through this mailing list will not verify correctly because of the footer added by SF. You should still be able to do outgoing spam and virus scans with the setup I suggested. The MailScanner setup at http://www.elandsys.com/resources/sendmail/mailscanner.html scans incoming and outgoing mail. >I shall write a how-to tonight (specific to my system :( ) and share >it with you >for comments, suggestions etc... That would be helpful. Jose asked about how to get dk-milter working with MailScanner. >p.s. how does my signature look? It looks correct. Regards, -sm |
From: SM <sm...@re...> - 2005-08-03 17:48:21
|
Hi, At 03:47 03-08-2005, pu...@we... wrote: >i am running a mail server with mailscanner as my spam and virus >filter. i have >just installed dk-milter and the emails get signed as expected. unfortunately >they always fail. this is more than likely due to the fact that the mails get >signed and then mailscanner adds it's scan headers, etc. i am assuming this >step will make the signature invalid! You should have dk-milter sign the mails after they have been processed by MailScanner. Regards, -sm |
From: Richard R. <ri...@se...> - 2005-08-03 18:36:44
|
SM wrote: > Hi, > At 03:47 03-08-2005, pu...@we... wrote: > >> i am running a mail server with mailscanner as my spam and virus >> filter. i have >> just installed dk-milter and the emails get signed as expected. >> unfortunately >> they always fail. this is more than likely due to the fact that the >> mails get >> signed and then mailscanner adds it's scan headers, etc. i am >> assuming this >> step will make the signature invalid! > > > You should have dk-milter sign the mails after they have been > processed by MailScanner. > Unless you're just trying to verify, then you should do dk-milter BEFORE mailscanner does its thing. -- Richard Rognlie | Sr. Consultant | Sendmail, Inc. | (703) 626-0726 |
From: Murray S. K. <ms...@se...> - 2005-08-03 22:14:22
|
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, SM wrote: > You should have dk-milter sign the mails after they have been processed > by MailScanner. Basically, plus verify before MailScanner adds any other headers. This may require running two instances of dk-milter, one in sign-only mode and one in verify-only mode, configured at opposite ends of the InputMailFilters list. |
From: <pu...@we...> - 2005-08-03 22:35:20
|
aha, just what i was looking for. i figured out last night that to verify incoming messages, the milter needs to get at the messages before mailscanner does. but, as per my orginal post, when sending the milter needs to sign the email after mailscanner has passed judgement. now, i readily accept that this may not be the best place to ask for this, in which case pointers to places where i can ask the following question would always be appreciated. how do i configure sendmail and dk-milter to verify incoming messages and sign only outgoing messages. i know that i have two sendmail processes running is it just a simple case of assigning each of the sendmail processes a differnet configuration? Cheers PJ Quoting "Murray S. Kucherawy" <ms...@se...>: > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, SM wrote: >> You should have dk-milter sign the mails after they have been >> processed by MailScanner. > > Basically, plus verify before MailScanner adds any other headers. > This may require running two instances of dk-milter, one in sign-only > mode and one in verify-only mode, configured at opposite ends of the > InputMailFilters list. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > dk-milter-discuss mailing list > dk-...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dk-milter-discuss > ------------------ www.websavages.com |
From: SM <sm...@re...> - 2005-08-03 23:27:22
|
At 15:33 03-08-2005, pu...@we... wrote: >now, i readily accept that this may not be the best place to ask for this, in >which case pointers to places where i can ask the following question would >always be appreciated. how do i configure sendmail and dk-milter to verify >incoming messages and sign only outgoing messages. i know that i have two >sendmail processes running is it just a simple case of assigning each of the >sendmail processes a differnet configuration? You run a dk-milter process for each sendmail process. I assume that one process accepting mail and the other sending mail. Each dk-process will have its own connection (socket). If you provide more details, you might get a better answer on this list. Regards, -sm |
From: <pu...@we...> - 2005-08-04 10:35:47
|
Quoting SM <sm...@re...>: > At 15:33 03-08-2005, pu...@we... wrote: >> now, i readily accept that this may not be the best place to ask for >> this, in >> which case pointers to places where i can ask the following question would >> always be appreciated. how do i configure sendmail and dk-milter to verify >> incoming messages and sign only outgoing messages. i know that i have two >> sendmail processes running is it just a simple case of assigning each of the >> sendmail processes a differnet configuration? > > You run a dk-milter process for each sendmail process. I assume that > one process accepting mail and the other sending mail. Each > dk-process will have its own connection (socket). > > If you provide more details, you might get a better answer on this list. > > Regards, ok so i have managed to get the dk-filter to only verify incoming messages on the incoming sendmail process. the outgoing process however is another matter. i send an email but it does not get signed. now could this be because the mail is being relayed? look forward to your thoughts Cheers PJ > -sm ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > dk-milter-discuss mailing list > dk-...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dk-milter-discuss > ------------------ www.websavages.com |
From: SM <sm...@re...> - 2005-08-04 15:54:36
|
At 03:33 04-08-2005, pu...@we... wrote: >ok so i have managed to get the dk-filter to only verify incoming messages on >the incoming sendmail process. the outgoing process however is another matter. >i send an email but it does not get signed. now could this be because the mail >is being relayed? look forward to your thoughts Dk-milter requires a list of domains for which to sign (-d) and a list of hosts or MTA names whose emails should be signed. How is your dk-milter configured for the outgoing process (command line parameters)? Is the outgoing sendmail process only processing a mailscanner generated queue or is the mail being relayed through localhost on a different port? Please send me a test email. Regards, -sm |
From: <pu...@we...> - 2005-08-04 22:35:04
|
Quoting SM <sm...@re...>: > At 03:33 04-08-2005, pu...@we... wrote: >> ok so i have managed to get the dk-filter to only verify incoming >> messages on >> the incoming sendmail process. the outgoing process however is >> another matter. >> i send an email but it does not get signed. now could this be >> because the mail >> is being relayed? look forward to your thoughts > > Dk-milter requires a list of domains for which to sign (-d) and a > list of hosts or MTA names whose emails should be signed. > > How is your dk-milter configured for the outgoing process (command > line parameters)? Is the outgoing sendmail process only processing a > mailscanner generated queue or is the mail being relayed through > localhost on a different port? > > Please send me a test email. I am starting the outgoing dk-filter as follows: dk-filter -l -p inet:8892@localhost -d websavages.com -c simple -s /path/to/pem -m MSA -S mail -u dkuser I have tried -m MTA as MTA is the name as defined in my sendmail daemon options Cheers PJ ------------------ www.websavages.com |
From: SM <sm...@re...> - 2005-08-05 02:54:55
|
Hi PJ, At 15:31 04-08-2005, pu...@we... wrote: >I am starting the outgoing dk-filter as follows: > >dk-filter -l -p inet:8892@localhost -d websavages.com -c simple -s >/path/to/pem >-m MSA -S mail -u dkuser > > >I have tried -m MTA as MTA is the name as defined in my sendmail >daemon options You are most probably not sending the email through the MSA port. In your case, use -m MTA. Is your outgoing sendmail process configured to use dk-milter? You have two sendmail processes and you may have two sendmail configuration (.cf) files. Regards, -sm |
From: <pu...@we...> - 2005-08-05 03:35:58
|
Quoting SM <sm...@re...>: > Hi PJ, > At 15:31 04-08-2005, pu...@we... wrote: >> I am starting the outgoing dk-filter as follows: >> >> dk-filter -l -p inet:8892@localhost -d websavages.com -c simple -s >> /path/to/pem >> -m MSA -S mail -u dkuser >> >> >> I have tried -m MTA as MTA is the name as defined in my sendmail >> daemon options > > You are most probably not sending the email through the MSA port. In > your case, use -m MTA. Is your outgoing sendmail process configured > to use dk-milter? You have two sendmail processes and you may have > two sendmail configuration (.cf) files. > like i said i had also tried using -m mta to no avail. yes i have been running the outgoing sendmail process with a different config file (-C/etc/mail/outbound.cf) is there anyway to confirm which sendmail configuration a sendmail process is using? in your previous reply you requested an email from me inorder to check the headers, if you check the headers on this mail they are the same in terms of hosts which it passes through. just out of curiosity what is a sm-msp sendmail process? Cheers PJ ------------------ www.websavages.com |