Thread: [Distel-hackers] Patch for emacs-unicode-2
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
lukeg
From: Dimitris D. <di...@gm...> - 2007-10-12 20:03:33
Attachments:
patch.txt
|
The problem with the emacs-unicode-2 branch is the decoding of the socket output. The solution is documented in "decoding process output" in elisp reference manual. http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/elisp/html_node/Decoding-Output.html I hope this helps. Dimitris |
From: Matthias R. <mat...@so...> - 2007-10-12 21:25:23
|
Dimitris, Dimitris Dinodimos wrote: > The problem with the emacs-unicode-2 branch is the decoding of the > socket output. > > The solution is documented in "decoding process output" in elisp > reference manual. > http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/elisp/html_node/Decoding-Output.html Unfortunately these functions are Gnu Emacs specific, so your patch would break XEmacs compatibility. Regards, Matthias |
From: Dimitris D. <di...@gm...> - 2007-10-12 22:53:06
Attachments:
patchV2.txt
|
Thank you Matthias. Is the revised patch compatible with xemacs? O/H Matthias Radestock έγραψε: > > Unfortunately these functions are Gnu Emacs specific, so your patch > would break XEmacs compatibility. > > Regards, > > Matthias > |
From: Bill C. <bil...@gm...> - 2007-10-16 23:00:59
|
Hi guys, Dimitris Dinodimos <di...@gm...> writes: > Thank you Matthias. Is the revised patch compatible with xemacs? > > O/H Matthias Radestock έγραψε: >> >> Unfortunately these functions are Gnu Emacs specific, so your patch >> would break XEmacs compatibility. >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias I haven't seen any followups from anyone on the list. This patch would appear to address the Emacs 23 (unicode branch) issues that have cropped up in various posts to the list in the past: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=pan.2007.06.03.15.58.55.157254%40gmail.com&forum_name=distel-hackers http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=45FC4033.8070800%40charter.net&forum_name=distel-hackers Unfortunately, I don't have a copy of Emacs 23 to test this on. Matthias, could you confirm that the patch doesn't cause any problems on XEmacs? Also, could some of the earlier Emacs 23 posters indicate whether this patch fixes the problems they had been experiencing? If so, I'll commit this patch. Thanks, Bill |
From: Matthias R. <mat...@so...> - 2007-11-03 14:13:08
|
Bill, apologies for taking so long to get back to you on this one ... Bill Clementson wrote: > Matthias, could you confirm that the patch doesn't cause any > problems on XEmacs? The patch doesn't seem to cause any problems for me under XEmacs. Matthias. |
From: Bill C. <bil...@gm...> - 2007-11-03 23:36:03
|
Hi Matthias, Matthias Radestock <mat...@so...> writes: > apologies for taking so long to get back to you on this one ... Better late than never... ;-) > Bill Clementson wrote: > >> Matthias, could you confirm that the patch doesn't cause any >> problems on XEmacs? > > The patch doesn't seem to cause any problems for me under XEmacs. It would have been nice to hear from some of the other people who want to use distel with the unicode CVS emacs branch so that we can confirm that it solves their issues with distel; however, since it doesn't cause problems for me on Gnu Emacs 22.1 and it doeesn't cause problems for you on XEmacs, I have committed the patch. - Bill |