#29 please support groupOfUniqueNames as well

[Anonymous]

Hey,

great job that you support groupOfNames as well. We are
using groupOfUniqueNames instead and d-a segfaults on
them. Support should be trivial, and maybe you could
add an option in the "compatibility"-menu (combobox:
Store groups as
* posixGroup only
* posixGroup + groupOfNames
* posixGroup + groupOfUniqueNames)

Otherwise: great work, thanks!

If time is short for you, maybe I could try to build a
patch for you.

On Questions, mail karsten@ecology.uni-kiel.de

[Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)]

Logged In: YES
user_id=150358

Tell you what, if you make a patch, I'll gladly review it
and incorporate it into the main source tree. Oh, and don't
forget to include yourself into the CREDITS file =)

Thanks for your offer. I'm really short on time, as you can
witness by my slowness to answer your question.

[Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)]

Logged In: YES
user_id=150358

It is indeed quite short, could you prototype a
solution/patch for it? And I have another question, are
groupOfNames and groupOfUniqueNames mutually exclusive
object classes? I mean, can I do both, because if I can,
I'll do both! =)

thanks in advance