[DIG-users] Fw: Towards DIG 2.0 - suggestions and work done at GUT
Brought to you by:
dturi
From: <kr...@et...> - 2005-11-07 14:58:33
|
(Sorry, if you receive two copies of this - or similar - email) Dear DIG users, From your lively discussion we hae learned that during ISWC'2005 there = is a meeting organized concerning presence and future of DIG. We at the = Gdansk Univresity of Technology (GUT) are DIG users who are developing = an extended version (or rather: versions) of DIG called DIGUT. It is = work done in the course of PIPS - a 6th FP project (www.pips.eu.org). = Because we are not at ISWC'2005, let us make a "remote contribution" to = this meeting: 1. Below you will find a brief description of changes made to DIG 1.1 in = the current version of DIGUT (1.3), applied in system KaSeA (presented = on the last DL Workshop as two posters).=20 2. At http://km.pg.gda.pl/kmg in Section "DIGUT" you will find = description and reference for DIGUT v.2.0 that is now under = implementation in KaSeA. DIGUT 2.0 covers also terminological Tells = (DIGUT 1.3 does not, as in current stable version of KaSeA a terminology = is loaded in OWL). We hope that this material will be helpful for you and for further DIG = developments. Yours Kris Goczyla ***************************************** Main changes made to DIG 1.1 (implemented in DIGUT 1.3) Introducing equivalent, subsumes role, equivalent role and role instance = queries. The equivalent query asks whether concepts are equivalent. All = queries concerning roles have analogical semantics as corresponding = queries for concepts. For example, the query role instance asks about = the set of pairs of individuals, which are related with a specified = role. =20 Introducing maybe answer for instance query With addition to yes and no = answers in DIG, DIGUT can also answer that the Knowledge Base cannot = unambiguously say if a specified individual belongs to a specified = concept. In the current version of DIGUT such an answer can be given = only for instance query. In the next versions it will be also applied to = role instance query. =20 Introducing to the concept language valuerange, valuemin, valuemax and = valueequals expressions. The semantics of these expressions is = analogical as for corresponding expressions for attributes of an integer = and string types. However, these expressions are independent of the type = of an attribute. The terminology itself knows the type of a specified = attribute. =20 Enhanced expressiveness of toldValue query. In DIG toldValue query asks = about values of one attribute for one individual only. In DIGUT a set of = attributes and individuals, whose values of attributes are required, may = be listed and in addition, individuals may be given as instances of a = concept. *************************** ------------------------------------------------------------- Prof. Krzysztof Goczy=B3a, PhD, DSc, Gda=F1sk University of Technology, Department of Software Engineering Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics 80-288 Gda=F1sk, ul. Narutowicza 11/12 tel.: +48 58 347 13 18, fax: +48 58 347 27 27 |