Thread: [DIG-users] Meeting during ISWC 2005
Brought to you by:
dturi
Menu
▾
▴
dig-users
|
From: Kaplunova, A. <al....@tu...> - 2005-10-24 17:08:59
|
Hallo! On suggestion of Ralf M=F6ller I would suggest in the time of the ISWC = 2005 or OWL Workshop in Galway an "unofficial" meeting to the subject = DIG 2.0. Is there basically interest? How can we organize that best of all? Does somebody have an idea? Best regards Alissa Kaplunova ------------------ TU Hamburg-Harburg AB Softwaresysteme Harburger Schlossstr. 20 21079 Hamburg email: al....@tu... Tel.: 040 - 42878 - 2539 |
|
From: Ian H. <hor...@cs...> - 2005-10-24 17:31:51
|
On 24 Oct 2005, at 18:09, Kaplunova, Alissa wrote: > Hallo! > > On suggestion of Ralf M=F6ller I would suggest in the time of the ISWC=20= > 2005 or OWL Workshop in Galway an "unofficial" meeting to the subject=20= > DIG 2.0. > Is there basically interest? > How can we organize that best of all? Does somebody have an idea? Good idea. We could meet one day at the end of the technical sessions=20 and maybe spend a couple of hours before going to dinner (but I can't=20 make Tuesday as there is already a SWSA dinner that evening, and=20 Wednesday is the conference dinner). If we can find a suitable day, you=20= could ask one of the local organisers if there is any room available. Ian > > Best regards > > Alissa Kaplunova > ------------------ > TU Hamburg-Harburg > AB Softwaresysteme > Harburger Schlossstr. 20 > 21079 Hamburg > email: al....@tu... > Tel.: 040 - 42878 - 2539 > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. > Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course > Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 > Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information > _______________________________________________ > DIG-users mailing list > DIG...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dig-users |
|
From: Ian D. <ian...@hp...> - 2005-10-24 18:45:08
|
Alissa wrote: >> On suggestion of Ralf M=F6ller I would suggest in the time of the ISWC= =20 >> 2005 or OWL Workshop in Galway an "unofficial" meeting to the subject=20 >> DIG 2.0. >> Is there basically interest? >> How can we organize that best of all? Does somebody have an idea? I won't be attending ISWC this year, but Jeremy Carroll from the Jena=20 team will be there. Perhaps you could include him in any informal=20 discussion that goes on? My input to the discussion would be that DIG 2.0 should be focussed on=20 fixing the problems with DIG 1.1, rather than heading off into new=20 territory with additional features. At the very least, it should be a=20 layered standard, but I would actually suggest that new features (like=20 publish-subscribe interfaces) should be standardised as independent=20 services that a given reasoner can choose to support or not. Regards, Ian _______________________________________________________________________ Ian Dickinson HP Laboratories, Bristol, UK ph: +44 (117) 312 8796 http://www.hpl.hp.com/people/Ian_Dickinson mailto:ian...@hp... |
|
From: <r.f...@tu...> - 2005-10-31 12:36:37
|
On 24. Oct 2005, at 20:44 Uhr, Ian Dickinson wrote: > Alissa wrote: >>> On suggestion of Ralf M=F6ller I would suggest in the time of the = ISWC=20 >>> 2005 or OWL Workshop in Galway an "unofficial" meeting to the=20 >>> subject DIG 2.0. >>> Is there basically interest? >>> How can we organize that best of all? Does somebody have an idea? > I won't be attending ISWC this year, but Jeremy Carroll from the Jena=20= > team will be there. Perhaps you could include him in any informal=20 > discussion that goes on? > > My input to the discussion would be that DIG 2.0 should be focussed on=20= > fixing the problems with DIG 1.1, rather than heading off into new=20 > territory with additional features. I second this. Would be great to solve the problems analyzed in http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-85.html Best, Ralf= |
|
From: Ian H. <hor...@cs...> - 2005-10-31 13:22:54
|
On 31 Oct 2005, at 12:37, Ralf M=F6ller wrote: > > On 24. Oct 2005, at 20:44 Uhr, Ian Dickinson wrote: > >> Alissa wrote: >>>> On suggestion of Ralf M=F6ller I would suggest in the time of the=20= >>>> ISWC 2005 or OWL Workshop in Galway an "unofficial" meeting to the=20= >>>> subject DIG 2.0. >>>> Is there basically interest? >>>> How can we organize that best of all? Does somebody have an idea? >> I won't be attending ISWC this year, but Jeremy Carroll from the Jena=20= >> team will be there. Perhaps you could include him in any informal=20 >> discussion that goes on? >> >> My input to the discussion would be that DIG 2.0 should be focussed=20= >> on fixing the problems with DIG 1.1, rather than heading off into new=20= >> territory with additional features. > > I second this. Would be great to solve the problems analyzed in > http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-85.html Sounds fine, but as far as I know we still didn't agree on when to meet=20= did we? We seemed to have eliminated most possibilities and were left=20 with Friday evening. Is this OK for most/everyone? Ian > > Best, > > Ralf > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. > Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course > Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 > Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information > _______________________________________________ > DIG-users mailing list > DIG...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dig-users |
|
From: Sean B. <se...@cs...> - 2005-11-01 18:16:25
|
Ian Horrocks wrote: > On 31 Oct 2005, at 12:37, Ralf Möller wrote: > >> >> On 24. Oct 2005, at 20:44 Uhr, Ian Dickinson wrote: >> >>> Alissa wrote: >>> >>>>> On suggestion of Ralf Möller I would suggest in the time of the >>>>> ISWC 2005 or OWL Workshop in Galway an "unofficial" meeting to the >>>>> subject DIG 2.0. >>>>> Is there basically interest? >>>>> How can we organize that best of all? Does somebody have an idea? >>> >>> I won't be attending ISWC this year, but Jeremy Carroll from the Jena >>> team will be there. Perhaps you could include him in any informal >>> discussion that goes on? >>> >>> My input to the discussion would be that DIG 2.0 should be focussed >>> on fixing the problems with DIG 1.1, rather than heading off into new >>> territory with additional features. >> >> >> I second this. Would be great to solve the problems analyzed in >> http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-85.html > > > Sounds fine, but as far as I know we still didn't agree on when to meet > did we? We seemed to have eliminated most possibilities and were left > with Friday evening. Is this OK for most/everyone? > Can we take silence here as agreement? Sean -- Sean Bechhofer sea...@ma... http://homepages.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~seanb |
|
From: Volker H. <haa...@cs...> - 2005-11-01 22:39:05
|
On 1-Nov-05, at 13:15, Sean Bechhofer wrote: > Ian Horrocks wrote: > > >>> >> Sounds fine, but as far as I know we still didn't agree on when to >> meet did we? We seemed to have eliminated most possibilities and >> were left with Friday evening. Is this OK for most/everyone? >> > > Can we take silence here as agreement? Yes, at least for me. Friday evening is fine. Volker |
|
From: Olaf N. <ola...@un...> - 2005-11-03 11:10:18
|
Sean Bechhofer wrote: > > Can we take silence here as agreement? > > Sean > Friday evening is also fine for us. Best regards, Olaf |
|
From: Volker H. <haa...@cs...> - 2005-10-25 02:26:06
|
On 24-Oct-05, at 13:31, Ian Horrocks wrote: > On 24 Oct 2005, at 18:09, Kaplunova, Alissa wrote: > > >> Hallo! >> >> On suggestion of Ralf M=F6ller I would suggest in the time of the =20 >> ISWC 2005 or OWL Workshop in Galway an "unofficial" meeting to the =20= >> subject DIG 2.0. >> Is there basically interest? >> How can we organize that best of all? Does somebody have an idea? >> > > Good idea. We could meet one day at the end of the technical =20 > sessions and maybe spend a couple of hours before going to dinner =20 > (but I can't make Tuesday as there is already a SWSA dinner that =20 > evening, and Wednesday is the conference dinner). If we can find a =20 > suitable day, you could ask one of the local organisers if there is =20= > any room available. What about Thursday late afternoon or evening? The OWL workshop is =20 Fri-Sat. I have to leave for Dublin on Sat evening. Volker |
|
From: Sean B. <se...@cs...> - 2005-10-25 08:35:12
|
Volker Haarslev wrote: > On 24-Oct-05, at 13:31, Ian Horrocks wrote: > >> On 24 Oct 2005, at 18:09, Kaplunova, Alissa wrote: >> >> >>> Hallo! >>> >>> On suggestion of Ralf Möller I would suggest in the time of the ISWC >>> 2005 or OWL Workshop in Galway an "unofficial" meeting to the >>> subject DIG 2.0. >>> Is there basically interest? >>> How can we organize that best of all? Does somebody have an idea? >>> >> >> Good idea. We could meet one day at the end of the technical sessions >> and maybe spend a couple of hours before going to dinner (but I can't >> make Tuesday as there is already a SWSA dinner that evening, and >> Wednesday is the conference dinner). If we can find a suitable day, >> you could ask one of the local organisers if there is any room >> available. > > > What about Thursday late afternoon or evening? The OWL workshop is > Fri-Sat. I have to leave for Dublin on Sat evening. I have a project meeting scheduled for 5-8 on Thursday, but could meet later. That might be getting a bit late for technical discussion though. Sean -- Sean Bechhofer se...@cs... http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb |
|
From: Ian H. <hor...@cs...> - 2005-10-25 15:25:52
|
On 25 Oct 2005, at 09:35, Sean Bechhofer wrote: > Volker Haarslev wrote: > >> On 24-Oct-05, at 13:31, Ian Horrocks wrote: >>> On 24 Oct 2005, at 18:09, Kaplunova, Alissa wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hallo! >>>> >>>> On suggestion of Ralf M=F6ller I would suggest in the time of the =20= >>>> ISWC 2005 or OWL Workshop in Galway an "unofficial" meeting to the =20= >>>> subject DIG 2.0. >>>> Is there basically interest? >>>> How can we organize that best of all? Does somebody have an idea? >>>> >>> >>> Good idea. We could meet one day at the end of the technical =20 >>> sessions and maybe spend a couple of hours before going to dinner =20= >>> (but I can't make Tuesday as there is already a SWSA dinner that =20 >>> evening, and Wednesday is the conference dinner). If we can find a =20= >>> suitable day, you could ask one of the local organisers if there is =20= >>> any room available. >> What about Thursday late afternoon or evening? The OWL workshop is =20= >> Fri-Sat. I have to leave for Dublin on Sat evening. > > I have a project meeting scheduled for 5-8 on Thursday, but could meet=20= > later. That might be getting a bit late for technical discussion=20 > though. So how about Friday evening? (We are running out of options!) Ian > > Sean > > --=20 > Sean Bechhofer > se...@cs... > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X