Thread: RE: [DIG-users] Proposed f2f meeting to progress the DIG specific ation
Brought to you by:
dturi
From: Dickinson, I. J <Ian...@hp...> - 2004-06-16 09:56:23
|
Hi Sean, > I'd agree. A f2f is always a good idea, particularly when > there's likely > to be a fair bit of discussion. If we don't want to wait > until September > (although in reality given holidays, conferencing, etc etc it's not > actually *that* far away now), Agreed. > an alternative is to try and set up an > Access Grid meeting or something similar. We've had some success with > that recently. Do you (Ralf, Ian D) have those facilities? Sorry, that's a new one on me. What's an Access Grid? (though, under negation as failure, I expect the answer is "no we don't" :-) Ian |
From: Dickinson, I. J <Ian...@hp...> - 2004-09-07 13:43:51
|
Ian Horrocks wrote: > Several of the "usual suspects" will be at ADL, but holding > the meeting there > probably wont do anything to broaden the basis of the group > and encourage, e.g., > members of the Jean team to participate. This seems to be a > rather important > argument against having *the* meeting there (although it may > still make sense to have *a* meeting there). I agree. Sorry to be in radio silence for so long, I've been (very) busy with other stuff. My suggestion is that those who can meet at ADL do so, then we have a follow-up meeting in Manchester in (say) early October. I certainly won't be at ADL, but I understand that Ralf can't make it over to the UK, so it seems we can't manage a f2f involving all the currently known interested parties anyway. Regards, Ian _____________________________________________________________________ Ian Dickinson HP Labs, Bristol, UK mailto:ian...@hp... net www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Ian_Dickinson ph +44 (117) 312 8796 |
From: Sean B. <se...@cs...> - 2004-06-16 10:10:49
|
Dickinson, Ian J wrote: > Hi Sean, > >>I'd agree. A f2f is always a good idea, particularly when >>there's likely >>to be a fair bit of discussion. If we don't want to wait >>until September >>(although in reality given holidays, conferencing, etc etc it's not >>actually *that* far away now), > > Agreed. > > >>an alternative is to try and set up an >>Access Grid meeting or something similar. We've had some success with >>that recently. Do you (Ralf, Ian D) have those facilities? > > Sorry, that's a new one on me. What's an Access Grid? (though, under > negation as failure, I expect the answer is "no we don't" :-) Negation as Failure? No, I don't think we'll be having that. Remember the "D" in DIG ;-) Access Grid has been described as "videoconferencing on steroids" but it's more than that really. Basically supports distributed meetings through video, audio, shared workspaces etc. http://www.accessgrid.org/ You don't actually need that much hardware to participate -- I believe it'll all run on a basic machine with suitable peripherals (e.g. camera/mic). Sean -- Sean Bechhofer se...@cs... http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb |
From: Daniele T. <dt...@cs...> - 2004-07-16 09:53:17
|
It seems time to make a decision re the f2f meeting. Sean and I propose to have it on Friday September 10 in Manchester. (Alternative dates in the week 6-10 September could be arranged.) For those who cannot attend and are interested we can set up an Access Grid meeting. Please let us know your availability as soon as possible. Best, Daniele Sean Bechhofer wrote: > Dickinson, Ian J wrote: > >> Hi Sean, >> >>> I'd agree. A f2f is always a good idea, particularly when there's >>> likely to be a fair bit of discussion. If we don't want to wait >>> until September (although in reality given holidays, conferencing, >>> etc etc it's not actually *that* far away now), >> >> >> Agreed. >> >> >>> an alternative is to try and set up an Access Grid meeting or >>> something similar. We've had some success with that recently. Do you >>> (Ralf, Ian D) have those facilities? >> >> >> Sorry, that's a new one on me. What's an Access Grid? (though, under >> negation as failure, I expect the answer is "no we don't" :-) > > > Negation as Failure? No, I don't think we'll be having that. Remember > the "D" in DIG ;-) > > Access Grid has been described as "videoconferencing on steroids" but > it's more than that really. Basically supports distributed meetings > through video, audio, shared workspaces etc. > > http://www.accessgrid.org/ > > You don't actually need that much hardware to participate -- I believe > it'll all run on a basic machine with suitable peripherals (e.g. > camera/mic). > > Sean > -- Dr Daniele Turi Information Management Group, Department of Computer Science University of Manchester 2.100 Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Tel +44 (0) 161 275 6145 Fax 6211 http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~dturi |
From: <r.f...@tu...> - 2004-08-06 09:29:04
|
On 16.07.2004, at 11:52, Daniele Turi wrote: > It seems time to make a decision re the f2f meeting. > > Sean and I propose to have it on Friday September 10 in Manchester. > (Alternative dates in the week 6-10 September could be arranged.) > For those who cannot attend and are interested we can set up > an Access Grid meeting. Please let us know your availability > as soon as possible. > Dear colleagues, after the teaching period and just coming back from my vacation I return to the DIG meeting issue. Concering a meeting in Manchester (or Bristol), I see some problems w.r.t. funding (flight costs, etc.). Would it be possible to meet at ADL 04 (http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb/adl/) in Ulm (around 24th September)? Best regards, Ralf |
From: Daniele T. <dt...@cs...> - 2004-08-06 10:13:28
|
Ralf Möller wrote: > > Concering a meeting in Manchester (or Bristol), I see some problems > w.r.t. funding (flight costs, etc.). > Would it be possible to meet at ADL 04 > (http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb/adl/) in Ulm > (around 24th September)? > I would be able to attend ADL'04. Daniele -- Dr Daniele Turi Information Management Group, Department of Computer Science University of Manchester 2.100 Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Tel +44 (0) 161 275 6145 Fax 6211 http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~dturi |
From: Ian H. <hor...@cs...> - 2004-08-26 16:25:49
|
Daniele Turi wrote: > Ralf Möller wrote: > >> >> Concering a meeting in Manchester (or Bristol), I see some problems >> w.r.t. funding (flight costs, etc.). >> Would it be possible to meet at ADL 04 >> (http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb/adl/) in Ulm >> (around 24th September)? >> > > I would be able to attend ADL'04. Several of the "usual suspects" will be at ADL, but holding the meeting there probably wont do anything to broaden the basis of the group and encourage, e.g., members of the Jean team to participate. This seems to be a rather important argument against having *the* meeting there (although it may still make sense to have *a* meeting there). Ian > > Daniele > |