From: Robert K. <rik...@ho...> - 2003-04-13 22:28:25
|
Patric, I advise leaving it simple. In the long-term, as dia2code becomes more sophisticated, it would be reasonable to implement that sort of functionality as an option throughout the product. But several questions need to be answered, for example: 1. What visibility does the base attribute have? 2. What are the names of the getter and setter methods? These are not difficult questions, but I just advise that conversation be had before any long-term decisions be made. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patric Andersson" <ds9...@th...> To: <dia...@li...> Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 3:30 PM Subject: [Dia2code-general] Propeties in C# > Hallo all list subscribers. > My name is Patric Andersson and I am one of Richard Torkar's students. I am > looking at the C# support in Dia2Code. > > > > Now I got a question I hope somebody could help me with. > > What should I do about properties in C#? Should I make all attributes to > properties (with setters and getters methods), or only private or some other > visibility type, or just leave them as ordinary attributes? > > > > Patric. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger > for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and > disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX > and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com > _______________________________________________ > Dia2code-general mailing list > Dia...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dia2code-general > |