From: Germán <ger...@ya...> - 2011-10-16 22:42:24
|
Hi, Alejandro patch(parse_diagram.patch) solves the same problem as that of ftdebugger. Likewise, I do not have the necessary knowledge on the code to decide what is the best solution. if you used the patch of Ftdebugger, you can continue applying the patch from Alejandro to make use of the feature "surrogate keys"(generate_code_sql.patch). And finally, you can apply the patch that fixes the problem I found. On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:11:17 +0200 "oli...@t-..." <oli...@t-...> wrote: > Hi Germán, > > Thanks for your bug report. > Going back to the original mail from Alejandro Imass > (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=AANLkTimiVOtXNg6RSuMuPgBjD8a%3D7prL4B0TzawCBXL0%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=dia2code-general), > I realize that nobody ever answered to that mail. > Alejandro wrote: > > [...] > > I think these 2 patches are quite harmless to the current 0.83 and > > maybe to more current versions of dia2code. I have seen a couple of > > postings regarding the "unnamed association bug" like this one: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dia2code/+bug/442295 > > I read up on that bug report and applied the parse_diagram.patch : > > RCS file: /cvsroot/dia2code/dia2code/dia2code/parse_diagram.c,v > Working file: dia2code/parse_diagram.c > ---------------------------- > revision 1.4 > date: 2011/10/16 14:22:33; author: okellogg; state: Exp; lines: +38 -37 > Attachment 2146249 from > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dia2code/+bug/442295 > lets dia2code find the name of an association given in the diagram. > Thanks to Evgeny Shpilevsky (ftdebugger) for the parse_diagram.patch. > ---------------------------- > > However, now the patch to parse_diagram.c by Alejandro cannot be applied. > > Could you have a look? > > Thanks, > > Oliver > |