Dev-PHP is one project - with two branches sharing some common components / modules.
However we're going to build two projects ; is it the right choice ?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
should we make three repositories?
1. devphp editor(and only used components)
2. devphp ide(and only used components)
3. all shared components
what you mean?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
in this moment the important difference between the modules from editor and ide is the syneditpart. i find it should be the same code base for synedit and the code should be simple to compile with all modules.
about modules and subversion i cannot say something - never used. But for me it's not a problem to have 3 repositories.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
From http://sf.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3783158
Dev-PHP is one project - with two branches sharing some common components / modules.
However we're going to build two projects ; is it the right choice ?
should we make three repositories?
1. devphp editor(and only used components)
2. devphp ide(and only used components)
3. all shared components
what you mean?
Hi Urs,
First, i'm not sure
- that the question has a technical solution and
- that the question is functionally sane.
With CVS - we could have 1 repository and 3 modules.
Is it the same with subversion ?
You are the only one who compiled both projects.
According to you, is such a merge interesting ?
in this moment the important difference between the modules from editor and ide is the syneditpart. i find it should be the same code base for synedit and the code should be simple to compile with all modules.
about modules and subversion i cannot say something - never used. But for me it's not a problem to have 3 repositories.
Thanks.
in my opinion we started with two repositories, and it'll be enought. So...
Wait and see ;)
Well now!
The repository is dead, so...
> ...not a problem to have 3 repositories
And what about maintenance?
What you will say about such structure:
> What you will say about such structure :
I shall say that i'm interested, provided that Urs agrees...
What you will say about such structure:
|--3dPartyComponents
| |
| |---dev-cpp
| ---...
|
|--OwnSHAREDComponents
| |
| |---debugger
| |---classBrowser
| ---...
|
|--ide
| |
| |---data
| |---source
¦ ¦---non_shared_components
| ---...
|
|--editor
| |
| |---data
| |---source
¦ ¦---non_shared_components
| ---...
should be a folder for shared and not shared components. What you mean?
other structure is ok for me...
thanks