Re: [Devmon] devmon vs missing/empty indexes (compaq)

[Buchan M. <bg...@st...>]

On Wednesday, 20 June 2007, Schwimmer, Eric E *HS wrote:
> Curious.  What chassis type & generation are the servers you are
> monitoring?

The dev box is a:
ProLiant DL360 G4

The production box is:
ProLiant DL380 G4

> We are using HP ProLiant DL360/80 and a few ML380s.  We've had it
> running on G2 Proliants and upwards.
>
> Another question:  How do you have hpasm configured?
> Our configuration:
>   No kernel tainting
>   Enable snmp monitoring
>   Enable storage monitoring
>   Enable performance monitoring
>   Disable hpsmh (shouldn't matter, but...)

I think mainly the defaults, except on a few specific servers (where the=20
storage agent is giving problems).

> The only option that seems like it would really matter to me is the
> storage monitoring, and that seems like it would either be a "it works
> or it doesn't" deal, not a half-works kind of deal.

That's what I would think as well.

>
> -Eric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li...
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of
> Buchan Milne
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 4:26 PM
> To: dev...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Devmon] devmon vs missing/empty indexes (compaq)
>
> On Tuesday, 19 June 2007, Schwimmer, Eric E *HS wrote:
> > Hi Buchan,
> >
> > What version of the hpasm suite are you using to extend the snmp
>
> daemon?
>
> > The template was developed using the hpasm-7.5.x suite, and I
>
> currently
>
> > having it running without problem on version hpasm-7.7.0-115.
>
> I was runung against hpasm-7.5.1-8.rhel4
>
> But I upgraded a dev box to 7.8 (hpasm-7.8.0-88.rhel4), and that has the
> same
> problem for me (and same solution).
>
> Regards,
> Buchan



=2D-=20
Buchan Milne
ISP Systems Specialist - Monitoring/Authentication Team Leader
B.Eng,RHCE(803004789010797),LPIC-2(LPI000074592)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_slang_phrases