From: Whilding, C. <Cra...@me...> - 2006-03-09 15:12:13
|
I don't appear to have any ifName data so the primary field in the table fails. =20 That data would be useful here also. I only currently do a hobbit service check for cifs. =20 =20 ________________________________ From: dev...@li... [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Aiello, Steve (GE, Corporate, consultant) Sent: 09 March 2006 14:54 To: dev...@li... Subject: RE: [Devmon] NetApp =20 Oh yeah.... =20 I also have the generic if_load in my netapp template, works great. =20 I was also thinking about doing a nfs & cifs stats test too, so I can report on the general usage of the netapp. This data aids in our capacity planning. Just haven't had much time to dedicate to this yet.=20 -----Original Message----- From: Aiello, Steve (GE, Corporate, consultant)=20 Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:50 AM To: 'dev...@li...' Subject: RE: [Devmon] NetApp Here is my cpu test for the netapps. =20 Seems I put my device info in the cpu test, and you have some under the stats test. I also have something simular to your volume test, but I called it disk. I also tried to format the data in the same manner a 'df' command on *NIX. I did it this way, so that my trending tool (larrd) would start trending on the data instantly.. I forgot about the HTML format, that is causing issues. =20 Thanks for sharing your netapp template, saves me time :) =20 Steven=20 -----Original Message----- From: dev...@li... [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Whilding, Craig Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:38 AM To: dev...@li... Subject: RE: [Devmon] NetApp Snapmirror lag now done, it is designed to check all snapmirrors that run weekly. It will also report daily ones but wont alert if these take too long as there is no logic in devmon to check which is which. =20 Craig =20 =20 =09 ________________________________ From: dev...@li... [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Whilding, Craig Sent: 09 March 2006 11:29 To: dev...@li... Subject: [Devmon] NetApp =20 Here's what I've done for NetApp monitoring. I need to add in a check for snapmirror to meet our companies global policy on monitoring but the other bits are there.=20 =20 CPU currently just shows uptime as it was copied across from a cisco template. If anyone wants to add in something meaningful here it would be good. =20 Something that could be useful is a "not-tests" option for bb-hosts as quotas are not enabled on certain filers (same with snapmirror) so I don't want to show these as opposed to writing all the others I do want shown. =20 Please come back with any changes or improvements. =20 Thanks, =20 Craig |