RE: [Devmon] 6509 problem.

[Schwimmer, E. E *H. <EE...@hs...>]

When you query it by hand, does it respond to both snmp v1 & v2?

-Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li...=20
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf=20
> Of Aiello, Steve (GE, Corporate, consultant)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:52 AM
> To: dev...@li...
> Subject: RE: [Devmon] 6509 problem.
>=20
> That email was pretty ugly to read, so attaching log.
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev...@li...=20
> > [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf=20
> > Of Aiello, Steve (GE, Corporate, consultant)
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:48 AM
> > To: dev...@li...
> > Subject: RE: [Devmon] 6509 problem.
> >=20
> >=20
> > For myself (I have the counter64 Fix), that really didn't=20
> > help.  The one switch I am testing on is very unhappy with=20
> > polling, when using the existing 6509 template. I just=20
> > figured I would have to use it as a guide and try to find the=20
> > same info in other OIDS.
> >=20
> > For those curious, the existing template throws the=20
> following errors:
>=20