|
From: Buchan M. <bg...@st...> - 2011-09-12 15:51:38
|
On Monday, 12 September 2011 09:38:35 Jeremy Laidman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Buchan Milne <bg...@st...>wrote: > > I would like to make a stable release quite soon. Unfortunately, in > > March, quite soon was hopefully within a month, and now, it is still > > about the same > > ... > > I've been working on a spec file for SUSE and Redhat/Fedora Linuxes that > would be good to get into the next (or some future) release. It well works > for me, and another list subscriber (the original author of the spec file) > is also checking for Redhat/Fedora compatibility with a view to inclusion > into EPEL. Also would be good to have testers from other distros (eg > Mandriva). Should I log a tracker thingamy and post it there? Well, I am using the Mandriva package, which I maintain, on platforms including RHEL. But, I don't see a point in spending more effort on it myself when RH doesn't have equivalents of or implementations of useful Mandriva generically named macros (%_pre_useradd, %_post_service). I can possibly add conditional definitions of versions of these macros that work on RH-based distros. I would prefer to start with the Mandriva spec file and work from there myself: http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi- bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/devmon/current/SPECS/devmon.spec?view=log Since I have a repo for RHEL/Centos, which I know other users have used, it would avoid upgrade issues if there are any differences: http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/Xymon.repo http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/rhel5/hobbit/noarch/ Any rpm-related files which need changes we should consider implementing in the release (if possible). > I would love more people to test the current svn, and give feedback, > > > specifically on any open bugs. > > I'll be testing it out over the next couple of weeks. Feedback also in > tracker? Please. Regards, Buchan |