From: Byam, C. R <CR...@hs...> - 2008-05-10 13:17:32
|
On 5/9/08 4:47 PM, "Joshua Krause" <fo...@tr...> wrote: > I know a lot of the people in this group are using devmon to poll a lot of > cisco equipment along with others. I am trying to see what is the setup of > other people on there devmon.cfg. I am using devmon to monitor 283 hosts > which are mostly all cisco. Most of my devices are 2950¹s and 4948¹s but I > also have some 2970¹s, 3500¹s, 4500¹s, and 4 6509¹s, which are fully loaded. > The 6500¹s have probably 3-4 48 port gig blades and then 2-3 24-48 port sfp > ports. And I notice devmon is exceeding cycle times, so I¹ve up¹d the cycle > time to 120 from 60. I have changed the number of forks from 10-30 and still > having trouble exceeding cycle times. I have recently converted over my > if_stat and if_load to use the 64 bit counters for all my switches. And I am > noticing a new entry in my devmon.log ³Timed out waiting for delta transform > on oid ifOutOps_T for gsonc-spg-6509-2 to complete² which is from one of the > if_load template for the 64 bit counters. > > My server I am using is an IBM i346 series with 4 Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU > 3.20GHz and 4-8 gig ram. I use my server to run hobbit and devmon off of it. > So I am trying to see what is the best way to setup my devmon.cfg to allow me > to poll at a descent rate and not use up the cpu and load. I know some people > may be monitoring more or might have just tweaked there devmon.cfg where it is > better utilized. As you can tell I am not using the database function and if > that is a better way to do it I will go that route. Here is mine: > << snip, snip >> I'm monitoring about 1500 devices/route points and currently have 5 devmon monitors reporting to a single hobbit display. I think you'll find that spreading the snmp load across several devmon instances will improve your performance. Think virtualization. -- Chuck Byam Network Engineer University of Virginia Health System O: 434.924.1686 C: 434.566.1485 |