devmon-support — General Devmon support

Re: [Devmon] help/advice with template for HP server

[Ken C. <kco...@ry...>]

You can force the template via syntax in the hosts file:

you have the devmon tag in the hosts file, tweak like below:

devmon:model(<vendor-in-your-specs-file>;<sysdescr-in-your-specs-file>)




On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:05 AM, <dav...@re...> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I am looking for help setting up a template for HP servers
>
> I can get a description response by issuing  snmpget  -v2c -c public
> myhpserver 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0; response is SNMPv2-MIB::sysDescr.0 = STRING:
> Hardware: Intel64 Family 6 Model 45 Stepping 7 AT/AT COMPATIBLE -
> Software: Windows Version 6.1 (Build 7601 Multiprocessor Free)
>
> I made a template directory with a spec file which looks like
>
> vendor  : hp
> model   : 2008
> snmpver : 2
> sysdesc : Intel64 Family 6 Model
>
> When I run ./devmon --readbbhosts -vvvvv, the output gives
>
>  [16-07-27@14:59:45] No matching templates for device: myhpserver
>
>
> I have tried numerous variations for sysdesc in the specs file, from the
> whole string to just the word Windows, and every time I get the same rsult
> of no matching templates.
>
> I had done this before for an HP switch and a 3com switch both of which
> were relatively simple to set up so I dont think I am doing anything wrong
> (but perhaps I am)
>
> Any help, suggestions, pointers would be much appreciated
>
>
> David
>
>
>
>
> <div>
> <p><a href="http://www.paisley2021.co.uk/"><img src="
> http://web.renfrewshire.gov.uk/paisley2021/Paisley2021_Email_Signature-450px.jpg"
> alt="Paisley2021 Facebook"></a></p>
> <table>
> <tr>
> <td><a style="color: #C10076; font-weight:
> bold;text-decoration:none;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size: 90%;"
> href="https://www.facebook.com/paisley2021/"><img src="
> http://web.renfrewshire.gov.uk/paisley2021/Paisley2021_Facebook_20px.jpg"
> style="vertical-align: middle" alt="Paisley2021
> Facebook">&nbsp;/paisley2021&nbsp;</a></li></td>
> <td><a style="color: #C10076; font-weight:
> bold;text-decoration:none;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size: 90%;"
> href="https://twitter.com/paisley2021"><img  src="
> http://web.renfrewshire.gov.uk/paisley2021/Paisley2021_Twitter_20px.jpg"
> style="vertical-align: middle" alt="Paisley2021 Twitter">&nbsp;@Paisley2021
> &nbsp;</a></li></td>
> <td><a style="color: #C10076; font-weight:
> bold;text-decoration:none;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size: 90%;"
> href="https://www.instagram.com/paisley2021/"><img src="
> http://web.renfrewshire.gov.uk/paisley2021/Paisley2021_Insta_20px.jpg"
> style="vertical-align: middle"
> alt="Paisley2021">&nbsp;/paisley2021</a></li></td>
> </tr>
> </table>
> </div>
>
>
> <table width="600">
> <tr>
> <td>
> <hr size=2>
> <FONT FACE="arial">
>
> <p>Renfrewshire Council Website - http://www.renfrewshire.gov.uk</p>
>
> <p>This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they  are
> addressed.
> If you have received this email in error please notify the system
> manager.</p>
>
> <p>Renfrewshire Council may, in accordance with  the
> Telecommunications(Lawful Business Practice) (Interception of
> Communications) Regulations 2000, intercept e-mail messages for the purpose
> of monitoring or keeping a record of communications on the Council's system.
>
> If a message contains inappropriate dialogue it will automatically be
> intercepted by the Council's Internal Audit section who will decide whether
> or not the e-mail should be onwardly transmitted to the intended
> recipient(s).</p>
>
> <p>This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> Sophos for the presence of computer viruses.</p>
>
> </FONT>
>
> <hr size=2>
> </td>
> </tr>
> </table>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and
> traffic
> patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols
> are
> consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
> J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
> planning
> reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>



-- 


Ken Connell
Network Engineer
Computer & Communication Services
Ryerson University
350 Victoria St
RM AB50
Toronto, Ont
M5B 2K3
416-979-5000 x6709

[Devmon] help/advice with template for HP server

[<dav...@re...>]

Hi 

I am looking for help setting up a template for HP servers

I can get a description response by issuing  snmpget  -v2c -c public 
myhpserver 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0; response is SNMPv2-MIB::sysDescr.0 = STRING: 
Hardware: Intel64 Family 6 Model 45 Stepping 7 AT/AT COMPATIBLE - 
Software: Windows Version 6.1 (Build 7601 Multiprocessor Free)

I made a template directory with a spec file which looks like

vendor  : hp
model   : 2008
snmpver : 2
sysdesc : Intel64 Family 6 Model

When I run ./devmon --readbbhosts -vvvvv, the output gives

 [16-07-27@14:59:45] No matching templates for device: myhpserver


I have tried numerous variations for sysdesc in the specs file, from the 
whole string to just the word Windows, and every time I get the same rsult 
of no matching templates.

I had done this before for an HP switch and a 3com switch both of which 
were relatively simple to set up so I dont think I am doing anything wrong 
(but perhaps I am)

Any help, suggestions, pointers would be much appreciated


David




<div>
<p><a href="http://www.paisley2021.co.uk/"><img src="http://web.renfrewshire.gov.uk/paisley2021/Paisley2021_Email_Signature-450px.jpg" alt="Paisley2021 Facebook"></a></p>
<table>
<tr>
<td><a style="color: #C10076; font-weight: bold;text-decoration:none;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size: 90%;" href="https://www.facebook.com/paisley2021/"><img src="http://web.renfrewshire.gov.uk/paisley2021/Paisley2021_Facebook_20px.jpg" style="vertical-align: middle" alt="Paisley2021 Facebook">&nbsp;/paisley2021&nbsp;</a></li></td>
<td><a style="color: #C10076; font-weight: bold;text-decoration:none;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size: 90%;" href="https://twitter.com/paisley2021"><img  src="http://web.renfrewshire.gov.uk/paisley2021/Paisley2021_Twitter_20px.jpg" style="vertical-align: middle" alt="Paisley2021 Twitter">&nbsp;@Paisley2021&nbsp;</a></li></td>
<td><a style="color: #C10076; font-weight: bold;text-decoration:none;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size: 90%;" href="https://www.instagram.com/paisley2021/"><img src="http://web.renfrewshire.gov.uk/paisley2021/Paisley2021_Insta_20px.jpg" style="vertical-align: middle" alt="Paisley2021">&nbsp;/paisley2021</a></li></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>


<table width="600">
<tr>
<td>
<hr size=2>
<FONT FACE="arial">

<p>Renfrewshire Council Website - http://www.renfrewshire.gov.uk</p>

<p>This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they  are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.</p>

<p>Renfrewshire Council may, in accordance with  the Telecommunications(Lawful Business Practice) (Interception of Communications) Regulations 2000, intercept e-mail messages for the purpose of monitoring or keeping a record of communications on the Council's system.

If a message contains inappropriate dialogue it will automatically be intercepted by the Council's Internal Audit section who will decide whether or not the e-mail should be onwardly transmitted to the intended recipient(s).</p>

<p>This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by Sophos for the presence of computer viruses.</p>

</FONT>

<hr size=2>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

[Devmon] devmon errors with OS X/Darwin SNMP

[Bruce F. <bfe...@ba...>]

another set of eye would be helpful here.  snmpwalk works every time for 
the oids

The error seen in the log:

Error(s) while parsing 'ifOutSpeed'

Error(s) while parsing 'ifInSpeed' on Mac-Mini

My template:

-oids:

ifDescr        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2        : branch
ifSpeed        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.5        : branch
ifInOctets    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10        : branch
ifOutOctets    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.16        : branch

--Transforms:

# Create a human-readable ifc speed
# Get bit speed delta (so we dont have to provide custom delta limit)
ifInOps      : DELTA        : {ifInOctets}
ifOutOps     : DELTA        : {ifOutOctets}
# Convert our octets delta into bits per second
ifInBps        : MATH        : {ifInOps} x 8
ifOutBps    : MATH        : {ifOutOps} x 8
# Make some easily readable speed variables
ifInSpeed    : SPEED        : {ifInBps}
ifOutSpeed    : SPEED        : {ifOutBps}
# Now determine our percentage load, based on traffic and ifc speed
ifInLoad    : MATH        : ({ifInSpeed} / {ifSpeed}) x 100
ifOutLoad    : MATH        : ({ifOutSpeed} / {ifSpeed}) x 100
# Create an alias in a bracketed box, or nothing if alias is blank
#ifAliasBox      : REGSUB        : {ifAlias} /(\S+.*)/ [$1]/

--message:

<b>Interface error rates:</b>
Input load:  yellow={ifInLoad.thresh:yellow}%, red={ifInLoad.thresh:red}%
Output load: yellow={ifOutLoad.thresh:yellow}%, red={ifOutLoad.thresh:red}%
TABLE:rrd(DS:ds0:ifInOctets:DERIVE; DS:ds1:ifOutOctets:DERIVE)
Ifc name|Ifc Speed|Rate in (load %)|Rate out (load %)
{ifDescr}|{ifSpeed}|{ifInLoad.color}{ifInSpeed} 
({ifInLoad}%){ifInLoad.errors}|{ifOutLoad.color}{ifOutSpeed} 
({ifOutLoad}%){ifOutLoad.errors}

Re: [Devmon] exception template to alarm only if ifAliasBox contains string "uplink"

[KING, K. <KK...@at...>]

I am working on this as well. So far it is not working as advertised. :)  
I moved ifAliasBox to the first left position in the table define of the message. I can now use the ifAliasBox in the exception. Funny result is so far anything I put in the ifAliasBox : alarm : .+Avalib.+    just blanks out the alarmed list. As I try more things I will post back.

-Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: W.J.M. Nelis [mailto:Wim...@nl...] 
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 9:21 AM
To: dev...@li...
Subject: Re: [Devmon] exception template to alarm only if ifAliasBox contains string "uplink"

Hallo,

> I currently use another solution, that is not fully does, what I need, 
> but is good for now:
>
> ifAliasBox : only : .*uplink.*
>
> This line causes that only interfaces are listed, which hold the word 
> "uplink" in their alias field.
Ok, I understand that. In module dm_tests.pm at about line 2220, it checks all the OIDs on the row in the table for an 'ignore' or an 'only' 
directive. Thus you can select only certain rows to appear in the table. 
This is new for me.

> Thank you for your answers! I will come back to your hint with forming 
> another table.
>
> You said, that only the primary oid is valid for alarm definitions. Is 
> the primary one the first line in the oids file the corresponding 
> template? If so, would you think it is possible to simply switch 
> ifName with ifAlias and then use one of my alarm definition from my first message?
>
Yes. In the same module, at about  line 2109, you can find:

        # Make the first oid (from left to right) the primary one
         my $pri = $1 if $line =~ /\{(.+?)\}/;

in which $line contains the row definition of the table. It assigns the first name enclosed between curly brackets to $pri. Further on this variable is used in the alarms selection:

           my $pri_val = $oids->{$pri}{'val'}{$leaf};
           my $alarm = 1; # Alarm by default
           my $a_val  = $dev->{'except'}{$test}{$pri}{'alarm'} ||
             $dev->{'except'}{'all'}{$pri}{'alarm'} ||
             $tmpl->{'oids'}{$pri}{'except'}{'alarm'};
           $alarm = ($pri_val =~ /^(?:$a_val)$/) ? 1 : 0  if defined $a_val;

           my $na_val = $dev->{'except'}{$test}{$pri}{'noalarm'} ||
             $dev->{'except'}{'all'}{$pri}{'noalarm'} ||
             $tmpl->{'oids'}{$pri}{'except'}{'noalarm'};
           $alarm = 0 if defined $na_val and $pri_val =~ /^(?:$na_val)$/;

So your proposal should work.

Regards,
   Wim Nelis.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
Devmon-support mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support

Re: [Devmon] exception template to alarm only if ifAliasBox contains string "uplink"

[W.J.M. N. <Wim...@nl...>]

Hallo,

> I currently use another solution, that is not fully does, what I need,
> but is good for now:
>
> ifAliasBox : only : .*uplink.*
>
> This line causes that only interfaces are listed, which hold the word
> "uplink" in their alias field.
Ok, I understand that. In module dm_tests.pm at about line 2220, it checks 
all the OIDs on the row in the table for an 'ignore' or an 'only' 
directive. Thus you can select only certain rows to appear in the table. 
This is new for me.

> Thank you for your answers! I will come back to your hint with forming
> another table.
>
> You said, that only the primary oid is valid for alarm definitions. Is
> the primary one the first line in the oids file the corresponding
> template? If so, would you think it is possible to simply switch ifName
> with ifAlias and then use one of my alarm definition from my first message?
>
Yes. In the same module, at about  line 2109, you can find:

        # Make the first oid (from left to right) the primary one
         my $pri = $1 if $line =~ /\{(.+?)\}/;

in which $line contains the row definition of the table. It assigns the 
first name enclosed between curly brackets to $pri. Further on this 
variable is used in the alarms selection:

           my $pri_val = $oids->{$pri}{'val'}{$leaf};
           my $alarm = 1; # Alarm by default
           my $a_val  = $dev->{'except'}{$test}{$pri}{'alarm'} ||
             $dev->{'except'}{'all'}{$pri}{'alarm'} ||
             $tmpl->{'oids'}{$pri}{'except'}{'alarm'};
           $alarm = ($pri_val =~ /^(?:$a_val)$/) ? 1 : 0  if defined $a_val;

           my $na_val = $dev->{'except'}{$test}{$pri}{'noalarm'} ||
             $dev->{'except'}{'all'}{$pri}{'noalarm'} ||
             $tmpl->{'oids'}{$pri}{'except'}{'noalarm'};
           $alarm = 0 if defined $na_val and $pri_val =~ /^(?:$na_val)$/;

So your proposal should work.

Regards,
   Wim Nelis.

Re: [Devmon] exception template to alarm only if ifAliasBox contains string "uplink"

[Oliver <r.o...@we...>]

Hallo,

I currently use another solution, that is not fully does, what I need, 
but is good for now:

ifAliasBox : only : .*uplink.*

This line causes that only interfaces are listed, which hold the word 
"uplink" in their alias field.

Thank you for your answers! I will come back to your hint with forming 
another table.

You said, that only the primary oid is valid for alarm definitions. Is 
the primary one the first line in the oids file the corresponding 
template? If so, would you think it is possible to simply switch ifName 
with ifAlias and then use one of my alarm definition from my first message?

Regards

Oliver




Am 20.07.2016 um 18:35 schrieb Nelis, Wim:
> Hello,
>
> As far as I know, only the alarm definitions using the primary OID, that is the name of the variable shown in the left-most column, are used by Devmon. Thus lines in file exceptions starting with name other than the primary OID name are ignored. Thus, if I am right, you cannot enable or disable alarms based on the value of any of the other fields shown in the table.
>
> An option using Devmon only could be to create a second table, using the MATCH operator. The second table will contain only the uplinks. You'll need to copy the variable(s) of interest to other variables, using the CHAIN operator. In this table you can enable alarms on all entries. Note however, that a switch without any uplinks will have an empty table. I do not know how Devmon will cope with that.
>
> This being said, I solved a similar problem using an external script. This script would take information from the tests if_stat and If_load, select only the links to other networking equipment (switch, router, AP) and alarm on being down, and alarm on ingress being zero while egress is not. (This script does handle an empty set of uplinks correctly.)
>
> Regards,
>    Wim Nelis.
> ________________________________________
> Van: Oliver <r.o...@we...>
> Verzonden: woensdag 20 juli 2016 9:17
> Aan: dev...@li...
> Onderwerp: [Devmon] exception template to alarm only if ifAliasBox contains string "uplink"
>
> Dear All,
>
> can you please help me to form a exception template for cisco switches?
> I'm looking for a template which should show all interfaces in the list
> (if_stat column), but xymon should only trigger alerts, if one of the
> uplink interfaces goes down. All other ports are client access ports and
> if someone powers off his computer, the port should not become red in xymon.
>
> I tried a lot of regex, but had no success. Unfortunately I'm not very
> familiar with those expressions, so I'm forced to approach using trial
> an error. So here is, what comes next to that, what i want, but as
> mentioned, it does not work:
>
> ifAliasBox : alarm : .*uplink.*
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ((?!uplink).)*
> ifName : ignore : Nu.+|Vl.+|Fa.+
>
>
> A bonus feature would be, if the exclude statement could be multiple
> values, e.g.:
>
> ifAliasBox : noalarm : ((?!uplink|Stack).)*
>
>
> These are my tries which did not work:
>
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ((?!uplink).)*
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : .*((?!uplink).)*
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : .*((?!uplink).).*
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : (?:(?!uplink).)*
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^((?!uplink).)*$
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^(?:(?!uplink).)*$
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^(.(?!" + uplink + "))*$
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^(.*(?!" + uplink + "))*$
>
> Thank you for your help!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
> patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
> consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
> J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
> reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
> patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
> consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
> J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
> reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>

Re: [Devmon] exception template to alarm only if ifAliasBox contains string "uplink"

[Nelis, W. <Wim...@nl...>]

Hello,

As far as I know, only the alarm definitions using the primary OID, that is the name of the variable shown in the left-most column, are used by Devmon. Thus lines in file exceptions starting with name other than the primary OID name are ignored. Thus, if I am right, you cannot enable or disable alarms based on the value of any of the other fields shown in the table.

An option using Devmon only could be to create a second table, using the MATCH operator. The second table will contain only the uplinks. You'll need to copy the variable(s) of interest to other variables, using the CHAIN operator. In this table you can enable alarms on all entries. Note however, that a switch without any uplinks will have an empty table. I do not know how Devmon will cope with that.

This being said, I solved a similar problem using an external script. This script would take information from the tests if_stat and If_load, select only the links to other networking equipment (switch, router, AP) and alarm on being down, and alarm on ingress being zero while egress is not. (This script does handle an empty set of uplinks correctly.)

Regards,
  Wim Nelis.
________________________________________
Van: Oliver <r.o...@we...>
Verzonden: woensdag 20 juli 2016 9:17
Aan: dev...@li...
Onderwerp: [Devmon] exception template to alarm only if ifAliasBox contains string "uplink"

Dear All,

can you please help me to form a exception template for cisco switches?
I'm looking for a template which should show all interfaces in the list
(if_stat column), but xymon should only trigger alerts, if one of the
uplink interfaces goes down. All other ports are client access ports and
if someone powers off his computer, the port should not become red in xymon.

I tried a lot of regex, but had no success. Unfortunately I'm not very
familiar with those expressions, so I'm forced to approach using trial
an error. So here is, what comes next to that, what i want, but as
mentioned, it does not work:

ifAliasBox : alarm : .*uplink.*
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ((?!uplink).)*
ifName : ignore : Nu.+|Vl.+|Fa.+


A bonus feature would be, if the exclude statement could be multiple
values, e.g.:

ifAliasBox : noalarm : ((?!uplink|Stack).)*


These are my tries which did not work:

ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ((?!uplink).)*
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : .*((?!uplink).)*
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : .*((?!uplink).).*
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : (?:(?!uplink).)*
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^((?!uplink).)*$
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^(?:(?!uplink).)*$
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^(.(?!" + uplink + "))*$
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^(.*(?!" + uplink + "))*$

Thank you for your help!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
Devmon-support mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support

Re: [Devmon] exception template to alarm only if ifAliasBox contains string "uplink"

[Ken C. <kco...@ry...>]

I too have wanted to do the same and like you didn't get too far.

I ended up writing an external script which is basically does  SNMP polls
for ifAlias, ifDescr, & ifOperStatus and grep out whatever I'm interested
and trigger on link down and then update the Xymon display.

On Jul 20, 2016 3:18 AM, "Oliver" <r.o...@we...> wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> can you please help me to form a exception template for cisco switches?
> I'm looking for a template which should show all interfaces in the list
> (if_stat column), but xymon should only trigger alerts, if one of the
> uplink interfaces goes down. All other ports are client access ports and
> if someone powers off his computer, the port should not become red in
> xymon.
>
> I tried a lot of regex, but had no success. Unfortunately I'm not very
> familiar with those expressions, so I'm forced to approach using trial
> an error. So here is, what comes next to that, what i want, but as
> mentioned, it does not work:
>
> ifAliasBox : alarm : .*uplink.*
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ((?!uplink).)*
> ifName : ignore : Nu.+|Vl.+|Fa.+
>
>
> A bonus feature would be, if the exclude statement could be multiple
> values, e.g.:
>
> ifAliasBox : noalarm : ((?!uplink|Stack).)*
>
>
> These are my tries which did not work:
>
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ((?!uplink).)*
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : .*((?!uplink).)*
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : .*((?!uplink).).*
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : (?:(?!uplink).)*
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^((?!uplink).)*$
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^(?:(?!uplink).)*$
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^(.(?!" + uplink + "))*$
> ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^(.*(?!" + uplink + "))*$
>
> Thank you for your help!
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and
> traffic
> patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols
> are
> consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
> J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
> planning
> reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>

[Devmon] exception template to alarm only if ifAliasBox contains string "uplink"

[Oliver <r.o...@we...>]

Dear All,

can you please help me to form a exception template for cisco switches? 
I'm looking for a template which should show all interfaces in the list 
(if_stat column), but xymon should only trigger alerts, if one of the 
uplink interfaces goes down. All other ports are client access ports and 
if someone powers off his computer, the port should not become red in xymon.

I tried a lot of regex, but had no success. Unfortunately I'm not very 
familiar with those expressions, so I'm forced to approach using trial 
an error. So here is, what comes next to that, what i want, but as 
mentioned, it does not work:

ifAliasBox : alarm : .*uplink.*
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ((?!uplink).)*
ifName : ignore : Nu.+|Vl.+|Fa.+


A bonus feature would be, if the exclude statement could be multiple 
values, e.g.:

ifAliasBox : noalarm : ((?!uplink|Stack).)*


These are my tries which did not work:

ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ((?!uplink).)*
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : .*((?!uplink).)*
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : .*((?!uplink).).*
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : (?:(?!uplink).)*
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^((?!uplink).)*$
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^(?:(?!uplink).)*$
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^(.(?!" + uplink + "))*$
ifAliasBox : noalarm  : ^(.*(?!" + uplink + "))*$

Thank you for your help!

[Devmon] Patch for including directories in hosts.cfg

[Root, P. T <Pau...@Ce...>]

Hi,
                I just reorganized my xymon hosts.cfg to use directories to better organize my machines.  I completely forgot devmon -readbbhosts.

                So I made a quick change to dm_config.pm to pick up *.cfg files in directories.

*** dm_config.pm        Tue Mar 29 10:35:58 2016
--- /usr/local/devmon/modules/dm_config.pm      Fri Jan 23 09:41:27 2009
***************
*** 1267,1274 ****
            next FILEREAD;
        }

- #       print "working on $bbfile\n";
-
       # Now interate through our file and suck out the juicy bits
        FILELINE: while ( my $line= <BBFILE> ) {
          chomp $line;
--- 1267,1272 ----
***************
*** 1287,1311 ****
            push @bbfiles, $file;
          }

-          # Check for directory includes
-               if($line =~ /^\s*(?:disp|net)?directory\s+(.+)$/i) {
-                       my $directory = $1;
-                  # Tack on our etc dir if this isn't an absolute path
-                       $directory = "$etcdir/$directory" if $directory !~ /^\//;
-      #                 print "reading $directory\n";
-
-                  # Add the file to our read array
-               opendir (DIR, $directory) || warn "Cannot open $directory\n";
-                       my $file;
-                       while ($file = readdir (DIR)) {
-                          # I name all config files with a .cfg
-                               if (grep (/\.cfg/, $file)) {
-                                       push @bbfiles, $directory . '/' . $file;
-                               }
-                       }
-                       close (DIR);
-               }
-
         # Else see if this line matches the ip/host bb-hosts format
          elsif($line =~ /^\s*(\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+)\s+(\S+)(.*)$/i) {
            my ($ip, $host, $bbopts) = ($1, $2, $3);
--- 1285,1290 ----


Devmon version 0.3.1-beta1.

Paul Root
Lead Engineer
CenturyLink Network Reliability Operations Center

390 Commerce Dr
Woodbury, MN 55125
Direct: (651)312-5207
Pau...@ce...

This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.

[Devmon] template for VMware ESXi 5.5

[Root, P. T <Pau...@Ce...>]

I'm trying to build up a template for ESXi.
Anybody have one built already, or a start?

Paul Root
Lead Engineer
CenturyLink Network Reliability Operations Center

390 Commerce Dr
Woodbury, MN 55125
Direct: (651)312-5207
Pau...@ce...

This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[Ken C. <kco...@ry...>]

OK, gotcha.

You can specific a specific a template for one particular host via the
hosts.cfg file, that way the template your tweaking will only affect that
one host.
On Jan 27, 2016 8:00 AM, "Steve B" <rec...@gm...> wrote:

> Ken,
>
> the template works fine unless the probe is plugged in. The template is in
> place now for 150+ sites worldwide. I have to be very careful about
> creating new columns and such as it will affect all my sites.
>
> If I break it up without the temperature column, it will work. If I only
> show the temperature column, it will work if the probe is plugged in. I do
> see the rationale behind breaking the test up to find the culprit in
> typical circumstances but not here.
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Ken Connell <kco...@ry...> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I didn't mean to end up with multiple templates (well maybe 2), I
> > just meant break it apart to make it easier to troubleshoot then put it
> > back together in the end.
> > On Jan 27, 2016 4:34 AM, "Steve B" <rec...@gm...> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't really see the point in doing that.  I might as well make a
> > second
> > > template then, which is what we discussed at the start.
> > >
> > > I would like to know why Devmon is acting in the way it is as it's not
> > the
> > > first time this has happened and to find a solution.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Ken Connell <kco...@ry...>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > build a separate test for just that OID and remove it from the
> original
> > > > test dir/template and OID/transforms/thresholds/message files.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Steve B <rec...@gm...>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > for ibmupstmp
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm using this:
> > > > >
> > > > > xupsEnvRemoteTemp     1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5
> > > > > The reading of a remote temperature sensor connected to the UPS or
> > SNMP
> > > > > agent.
> > > > > OBJECT-TYPE
> > > > >       INTEGER     -100..200
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Ken Connell <kco...@ry...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is ibmupstmp output an INTEGER  value ?
> > > > > > On Jan 26, 2016 9:19 AM, "Steve B" <rec...@gm...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > That is the strange thing about this. If I individually
> snmpwalk
> > > all
> > > > > > those
> > > > > > > oids (with probe removed), they give good results. Except of
> > course
> > > > the
> > > > > > > ibmupstmp which just gives an empty result as one would expect.
> > I
> > > > > > checked
> > > > > > > all the transforms already, all use different names.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:04 PM, W.J.M. Nelis <
> Wim...@nl...>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello  Steve,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > here is what I have in the ibmups template I have made (in
> > > terms
> > > > of
> > > > > > > oids)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > check/column:batt-capacity
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > upsBatteryStatus        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.1.0
> > >  :
> > > > > > leaf
> > > > > > > > > upsEstimatedminsrem     : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.3.0
> > >  :
> > > > > > leaf
> > > > > > > > > upsEstimateChargerem    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.4.0
> > >  :
> > > > > > leaf
> > > > > > > > > upsBattVoltage          : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.5.0
> > >  :
> > > > > > leaf
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > check/column:ibmupspwr
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > inputvolt       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > > > inputfreq       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > > > outputvolt      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > > > outputcurr      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > > > outputpwr       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > > > outputloadlvl   : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.5.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > check/column:ibmupstmp
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > IBMTemp         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5.0               :
> > leaf
> > > > > > > > > IBMHumi         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.6.0               :
> > leaf
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For temperature output, it says unknown and the other
> checks
> > > all
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > unknown/no data (with no SNMP data in logs)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Is it perhaps something to do with the ending in 0 or not?
> I
> > do
> > > > > > > remember
> > > > > > > > > testing those out.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't think that the last digit of the OID does matter.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Assuming that also the OIDS defined in the transforms-files
> all
> > > > have
> > > > > > > > different names, the next thing you could check is the
> > behaviour
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > IBM
> > > > > > > > UPS device. If the temperature-probe is removed, can you get
> > the
> > > > > > > > information of all the OIDs starting with ".1.3.6.`.2.1.33",
> > > using
> > > > a
> > > > > > > basic
> > > > > > > > utility like snmpget? If so, there must be something wrong in
> > > > devmon.
> > > > > > If
> > > > > > > > not so, the UPS is behaving strangely.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > >    Wim Nelis.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> > > > > Performance
> > > > > > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just
> > $35/Month
> > > > > > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective
> actions
> > > now
> > > > > > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup
> > Now!
> > > > > > > >
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > > > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> > > > Performance
> > > > > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just
> $35/Month
> > > > > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions
> > now
> > > > > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup
> Now!
> > > > > > >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> > > Performance
> > > > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions
> now
> > > > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> > Performance
> > > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ken Connell
> > > > Network Engineer
> > > > Computer & Communication Services
> > > > Ryerson University
> > > > 350 Victoria St
> > > > RM AB50
> > > > Toronto, Ont
> > > > M5B 2K3
> > > > 416-979-5000 x6709
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> Performance
> > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > Dev...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devmon-support mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[Steve B <rec...@gm...>]

Ken,

the template works fine unless the probe is plugged in. The template is in
place now for 150+ sites worldwide. I have to be very careful about
creating new columns and such as it will affect all my sites.

If I break it up without the temperature column, it will work. If I only
show the temperature column, it will work if the probe is plugged in. I do
see the rationale behind breaking the test up to find the culprit in
typical circumstances but not here.

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Ken Connell <kco...@ry...> wrote:

> Sorry, I didn't mean to end up with multiple templates (well maybe 2), I
> just meant break it apart to make it easier to troubleshoot then put it
> back together in the end.
> On Jan 27, 2016 4:34 AM, "Steve B" <rec...@gm...> wrote:
>
> > I don't really see the point in doing that.  I might as well make a
> second
> > template then, which is what we discussed at the start.
> >
> > I would like to know why Devmon is acting in the way it is as it's not
> the
> > first time this has happened and to find a solution.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Ken Connell <kco...@ry...>
> wrote:
> >
> > > build a separate test for just that OID and remove it from the original
> > > test dir/template and OID/transforms/thresholds/message files.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Steve B <rec...@gm...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > for ibmupstmp
> > > >
> > > > I'm using this:
> > > >
> > > > xupsEnvRemoteTemp     1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5
> > > > The reading of a remote temperature sensor connected to the UPS or
> SNMP
> > > > agent.
> > > > OBJECT-TYPE
> > > >       INTEGER     -100..200
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Ken Connell <kco...@ry...>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Is ibmupstmp output an INTEGER  value ?
> > > > > On Jan 26, 2016 9:19 AM, "Steve B" <rec...@gm...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > That is the strange thing about this. If I individually snmpwalk
> > all
> > > > > those
> > > > > > oids (with probe removed), they give good results. Except of
> course
> > > the
> > > > > > ibmupstmp which just gives an empty result as one would expect.
> I
> > > > > checked
> > > > > > all the transforms already, all use different names.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:04 PM, W.J.M. Nelis <Wim...@nl...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello  Steve,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > here is what I have in the ibmups template I have made (in
> > terms
> > > of
> > > > > > oids)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > check/column:batt-capacity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > upsBatteryStatus        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.1.0
> >  :
> > > > > leaf
> > > > > > > > upsEstimatedminsrem     : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.3.0
> >  :
> > > > > leaf
> > > > > > > > upsEstimateChargerem    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.4.0
> >  :
> > > > > leaf
> > > > > > > > upsBattVoltage          : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.5.0
> >  :
> > > > > leaf
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > check/column:ibmupspwr
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > inputvolt       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > > inputfreq       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > > outputvolt      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > > outputcurr      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > > outputpwr       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > > outputloadlvl   : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.5.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > check/column:ibmupstmp
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > IBMTemp         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5.0               :
> leaf
> > > > > > > > IBMHumi         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.6.0               :
> leaf
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For temperature output, it says unknown and the other checks
> > all
> > > > have
> > > > > > > > unknown/no data (with no SNMP data in logs)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is it perhaps something to do with the ending in 0 or not? I
> do
> > > > > > remember
> > > > > > > > testing those out.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't think that the last digit of the OID does matter.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Assuming that also the OIDS defined in the transforms-files all
> > > have
> > > > > > > different names, the next thing you could check is the
> behaviour
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > IBM
> > > > > > > UPS device. If the temperature-probe is removed, can you get
> the
> > > > > > > information of all the OIDs starting with ".1.3.6.`.2.1.33",
> > using
> > > a
> > > > > > basic
> > > > > > > utility like snmpget? If so, there must be something wrong in
> > > devmon.
> > > > > If
> > > > > > > not so, the UPS is behaving strangely.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >    Wim Nelis.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> > > > Performance
> > > > > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just
> $35/Month
> > > > > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions
> > now
> > > > > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup
> Now!
> > > > > > >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> > > Performance
> > > > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions
> now
> > > > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> > Performance
> > > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> Performance
> > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > Ken Connell
> > > Network Engineer
> > > Computer & Communication Services
> > > Ryerson University
> > > 350 Victoria St
> > > RM AB50
> > > Toronto, Ont
> > > M5B 2K3
> > > 416-979-5000 x6709
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > Dev...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devmon-support mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[Ken C. <kco...@ry...>]

Sorry, I didn't mean to end up with multiple templates (well maybe 2), I
just meant break it apart to make it easier to troubleshoot then put it
back together in the end.
On Jan 27, 2016 4:34 AM, "Steve B" <rec...@gm...> wrote:

> I don't really see the point in doing that.  I might as well make a second
> template then, which is what we discussed at the start.
>
> I would like to know why Devmon is acting in the way it is as it's not the
> first time this has happened and to find a solution.
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Ken Connell <kco...@ry...> wrote:
>
> > build a separate test for just that OID and remove it from the original
> > test dir/template and OID/transforms/thresholds/message files.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Steve B <rec...@gm...> wrote:
> >
> > > for ibmupstmp
> > >
> > > I'm using this:
> > >
> > > xupsEnvRemoteTemp     1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5
> > > The reading of a remote temperature sensor connected to the UPS or SNMP
> > > agent.
> > > OBJECT-TYPE
> > >       INTEGER     -100..200
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Ken Connell <kco...@ry...>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is ibmupstmp output an INTEGER  value ?
> > > > On Jan 26, 2016 9:19 AM, "Steve B" <rec...@gm...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > That is the strange thing about this. If I individually snmpwalk
> all
> > > > those
> > > > > oids (with probe removed), they give good results. Except of course
> > the
> > > > > ibmupstmp which just gives an empty result as one would expect.  I
> > > > checked
> > > > > all the transforms already, all use different names.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:04 PM, W.J.M. Nelis <Wim...@nl...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello  Steve,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > here is what I have in the ibmups template I have made (in
> terms
> > of
> > > > > oids)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > check/column:batt-capacity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > upsBatteryStatus        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.1.0
>  :
> > > > leaf
> > > > > > > upsEstimatedminsrem     : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.3.0
>  :
> > > > leaf
> > > > > > > upsEstimateChargerem    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.4.0
>  :
> > > > leaf
> > > > > > > upsBattVoltage          : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.5.0
>  :
> > > > leaf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > check/column:ibmupspwr
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > inputvolt       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > inputfreq       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > outputvolt      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > outputcurr      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > outputpwr       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.1 : leaf
> > > > > > > outputloadlvl   : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.5.1 : leaf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > check/column:ibmupstmp
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > IBMTemp         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5.0               : leaf
> > > > > > > IBMHumi         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.6.0               : leaf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For temperature output, it says unknown and the other checks
> all
> > > have
> > > > > > > unknown/no data (with no SNMP data in logs)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is it perhaps something to do with the ending in 0 or not? I do
> > > > > remember
> > > > > > > testing those out.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't think that the last digit of the OID does matter.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Assuming that also the OIDS defined in the transforms-files all
> > have
> > > > > > different names, the next thing you could check is the behaviour
> of
> > > the
> > > > > IBM
> > > > > > UPS device. If the temperature-probe is removed, can you get the
> > > > > > information of all the OIDs starting with ".1.3.6.`.2.1.33",
> using
> > a
> > > > > basic
> > > > > > utility like snmpget? If so, there must be something wrong in
> > devmon.
> > > > If
> > > > > > not so, the UPS is behaving strangely.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >    Wim Nelis.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> > > Performance
> > > > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions
> now
> > > > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> > Performance
> > > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> Performance
> > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > Dev...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Ken Connell
> > Network Engineer
> > Computer & Communication Services
> > Ryerson University
> > 350 Victoria St
> > RM AB50
> > Toronto, Ont
> > M5B 2K3
> > 416-979-5000 x6709
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devmon-support mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[Steve B <rec...@gm...>]

I don't really see the point in doing that.  I might as well make a second
template then, which is what we discussed at the start.

I would like to know why Devmon is acting in the way it is as it's not the
first time this has happened and to find a solution.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Ken Connell <kco...@ry...> wrote:

> build a separate test for just that OID and remove it from the original
> test dir/template and OID/transforms/thresholds/message files.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Steve B <rec...@gm...> wrote:
>
> > for ibmupstmp
> >
> > I'm using this:
> >
> > xupsEnvRemoteTemp     1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5
> > The reading of a remote temperature sensor connected to the UPS or SNMP
> > agent.
> > OBJECT-TYPE
> >       INTEGER     -100..200
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Ken Connell <kco...@ry...>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is ibmupstmp output an INTEGER  value ?
> > > On Jan 26, 2016 9:19 AM, "Steve B" <rec...@gm...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > That is the strange thing about this. If I individually snmpwalk all
> > > those
> > > > oids (with probe removed), they give good results. Except of course
> the
> > > > ibmupstmp which just gives an empty result as one would expect.  I
> > > checked
> > > > all the transforms already, all use different names.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:04 PM, W.J.M. Nelis <Wim...@nl...>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello  Steve,
> > > > >
> > > > > > here is what I have in the ibmups template I have made (in terms
> of
> > > > oids)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > check/column:batt-capacity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > upsBatteryStatus        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.1.0               :
> > > leaf
> > > > > > upsEstimatedminsrem     : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.3.0               :
> > > leaf
> > > > > > upsEstimateChargerem    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.4.0               :
> > > leaf
> > > > > > upsBattVoltage          : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.5.0               :
> > > leaf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > check/column:ibmupspwr
> > > > > >
> > > > > > inputvolt       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > > > > inputfreq       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > > > > outputvolt      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > > > > outputcurr      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > > > > outputpwr       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.1 : leaf
> > > > > > outputloadlvl   : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.5.1 : leaf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > check/column:ibmupstmp
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IBMTemp         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5.0               : leaf
> > > > > > IBMHumi         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.6.0               : leaf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For temperature output, it says unknown and the other checks all
> > have
> > > > > > unknown/no data (with no SNMP data in logs)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is it perhaps something to do with the ending in 0 or not? I do
> > > > remember
> > > > > > testing those out.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think that the last digit of the OID does matter.
> > > > >
> > > > > Assuming that also the OIDS defined in the transforms-files all
> have
> > > > > different names, the next thing you could check is the behaviour of
> > the
> > > > IBM
> > > > > UPS device. If the temperature-probe is removed, can you get the
> > > > > information of all the OIDs starting with ".1.3.6.`.2.1.33", using
> a
> > > > basic
> > > > > utility like snmpget? If so, there must be something wrong in
> devmon.
> > > If
> > > > > not so, the UPS is behaving strangely.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >    Wim Nelis.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> > Performance
> > > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> Performance
> > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > Dev...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devmon-support mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Ken Connell
> Network Engineer
> Computer & Communication Services
> Ryerson University
> 350 Victoria St
> RM AB50
> Toronto, Ont
> M5B 2K3
> 416-979-5000 x6709
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[Ken C. <kco...@ry...>]

build a separate test for just that OID and remove it from the original
test dir/template and OID/transforms/thresholds/message files.


On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Steve B <rec...@gm...> wrote:

> for ibmupstmp
>
> I'm using this:
>
> xupsEnvRemoteTemp     1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5
> The reading of a remote temperature sensor connected to the UPS or SNMP
> agent.
> OBJECT-TYPE
>       INTEGER     -100..200
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Ken Connell <kco...@ry...> wrote:
>
> > Is ibmupstmp output an INTEGER  value ?
> > On Jan 26, 2016 9:19 AM, "Steve B" <rec...@gm...> wrote:
> >
> > > That is the strange thing about this. If I individually snmpwalk all
> > those
> > > oids (with probe removed), they give good results. Except of course the
> > > ibmupstmp which just gives an empty result as one would expect.  I
> > checked
> > > all the transforms already, all use different names.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:04 PM, W.J.M. Nelis <Wim...@nl...>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello  Steve,
> > > >
> > > > > here is what I have in the ibmups template I have made (in terms of
> > > oids)
> > > > >
> > > > > check/column:batt-capacity
> > > > >
> > > > > upsBatteryStatus        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.1.0               :
> > leaf
> > > > > upsEstimatedminsrem     : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.3.0               :
> > leaf
> > > > > upsEstimateChargerem    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.4.0               :
> > leaf
> > > > > upsBattVoltage          : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.5.0               :
> > leaf
> > > > >
> > > > > check/column:ibmupspwr
> > > > >
> > > > > inputvolt       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > > > inputfreq       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > > > outputvolt      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > > > outputcurr      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > > > outputpwr       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.1 : leaf
> > > > > outputloadlvl   : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.5.1 : leaf
> > > > >
> > > > > check/column:ibmupstmp
> > > > >
> > > > > IBMTemp         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5.0               : leaf
> > > > > IBMHumi         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.6.0               : leaf
> > > > >
> > > > > For temperature output, it says unknown and the other checks all
> have
> > > > > unknown/no data (with no SNMP data in logs)
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it perhaps something to do with the ending in 0 or not? I do
> > > remember
> > > > > testing those out.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think that the last digit of the OID does matter.
> > > >
> > > > Assuming that also the OIDS defined in the transforms-files all have
> > > > different names, the next thing you could check is the behaviour of
> the
> > > IBM
> > > > UPS device. If the temperature-probe is removed, can you get the
> > > > information of all the OIDs starting with ".1.3.6.`.2.1.33", using a
> > > basic
> > > > utility like snmpget? If so, there must be something wrong in devmon.
> > If
> > > > not so, the UPS is behaving strangely.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >    Wim Nelis.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
> Performance
> > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > > Dev...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > Dev...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devmon-support mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>



-- 


Ken Connell
Network Engineer
Computer & Communication Services
Ryerson University
350 Victoria St
RM AB50
Toronto, Ont
M5B 2K3
416-979-5000 x6709

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[Steve B <rec...@gm...>]

for ibmupstmp

I'm using this:

xupsEnvRemoteTemp     1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5
The reading of a remote temperature sensor connected to the UPS or SNMP
agent.
OBJECT-TYPE
      INTEGER     -100..200



On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Ken Connell <kco...@ry...> wrote:

> Is ibmupstmp output an INTEGER  value ?
> On Jan 26, 2016 9:19 AM, "Steve B" <rec...@gm...> wrote:
>
> > That is the strange thing about this. If I individually snmpwalk all
> those
> > oids (with probe removed), they give good results. Except of course the
> > ibmupstmp which just gives an empty result as one would expect.  I
> checked
> > all the transforms already, all use different names.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:04 PM, W.J.M. Nelis <Wim...@nl...> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello  Steve,
> > >
> > > > here is what I have in the ibmups template I have made (in terms of
> > oids)
> > > >
> > > > check/column:batt-capacity
> > > >
> > > > upsBatteryStatus        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.1.0               :
> leaf
> > > > upsEstimatedminsrem     : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.3.0               :
> leaf
> > > > upsEstimateChargerem    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.4.0               :
> leaf
> > > > upsBattVoltage          : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.5.0               :
> leaf
> > > >
> > > > check/column:ibmupspwr
> > > >
> > > > inputvolt       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > > inputfreq       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > > outputvolt      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > > outputcurr      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > > outputpwr       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.1 : leaf
> > > > outputloadlvl   : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.5.1 : leaf
> > > >
> > > > check/column:ibmupstmp
> > > >
> > > > IBMTemp         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5.0               : leaf
> > > > IBMHumi         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.6.0               : leaf
> > > >
> > > > For temperature output, it says unknown and the other checks all have
> > > > unknown/no data (with no SNMP data in logs)
> > > >
> > > > Is it perhaps something to do with the ending in 0 or not? I do
> > remember
> > > > testing those out.
> > >
> > > I don't think that the last digit of the OID does matter.
> > >
> > > Assuming that also the OIDS defined in the transforms-files all have
> > > different names, the next thing you could check is the behaviour of the
> > IBM
> > > UPS device. If the temperature-probe is removed, can you get the
> > > information of all the OIDs starting with ".1.3.6.`.2.1.33", using a
> > basic
> > > utility like snmpget? If so, there must be something wrong in devmon.
> If
> > > not so, the UPS is behaving strangely.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >    Wim Nelis.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Devmon-support mailing list
> > > Dev...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> > >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devmon-support mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[Ken C. <kco...@ry...>]

Is ibmupstmp output an INTEGER  value ?
On Jan 26, 2016 9:19 AM, "Steve B" <rec...@gm...> wrote:

> That is the strange thing about this. If I individually snmpwalk all those
> oids (with probe removed), they give good results. Except of course the
> ibmupstmp which just gives an empty result as one would expect.  I checked
> all the transforms already, all use different names.
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:04 PM, W.J.M. Nelis <Wim...@nl...> wrote:
>
> > Hello  Steve,
> >
> > > here is what I have in the ibmups template I have made (in terms of
> oids)
> > >
> > > check/column:batt-capacity
> > >
> > > upsBatteryStatus        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.1.0               : leaf
> > > upsEstimatedminsrem     : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.3.0               : leaf
> > > upsEstimateChargerem    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.4.0               : leaf
> > > upsBattVoltage          : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.5.0               : leaf
> > >
> > > check/column:ibmupspwr
> > >
> > > inputvolt       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > inputfreq       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > outputvolt      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.2.1 : leaf
> > > outputcurr      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.3.1 : leaf
> > > outputpwr       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.1 : leaf
> > > outputloadlvl   : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.5.1 : leaf
> > >
> > > check/column:ibmupstmp
> > >
> > > IBMTemp         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5.0               : leaf
> > > IBMHumi         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.6.0               : leaf
> > >
> > > For temperature output, it says unknown and the other checks all have
> > > unknown/no data (with no SNMP data in logs)
> > >
> > > Is it perhaps something to do with the ending in 0 or not? I do
> remember
> > > testing those out.
> >
> > I don't think that the last digit of the OID does matter.
> >
> > Assuming that also the OIDS defined in the transforms-files all have
> > different names, the next thing you could check is the behaviour of the
> IBM
> > UPS device. If the temperature-probe is removed, can you get the
> > information of all the OIDs starting with ".1.3.6.`.2.1.33", using a
> basic
> > utility like snmpget? If so, there must be something wrong in devmon. If
> > not so, the UPS is behaving strangely.
> >
> > Regards,
> >    Wim Nelis.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devmon-support mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[Steve B <rec...@gm...>]

That is the strange thing about this. If I individually snmpwalk all those
oids (with probe removed), they give good results. Except of course the
ibmupstmp which just gives an empty result as one would expect.  I checked
all the transforms already, all use different names.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:04 PM, W.J.M. Nelis <Wim...@nl...> wrote:

> Hello  Steve,
>
> > here is what I have in the ibmups template I have made (in terms of oids)
> >
> > check/column:batt-capacity
> >
> > upsBatteryStatus        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.1.0               : leaf
> > upsEstimatedminsrem     : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.3.0               : leaf
> > upsEstimateChargerem    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.4.0               : leaf
> > upsBattVoltage          : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.5.0               : leaf
> >
> > check/column:ibmupspwr
> >
> > inputvolt       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.3.1 : leaf
> > inputfreq       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.2.1 : leaf
> > outputvolt      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.2.1 : leaf
> > outputcurr      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.3.1 : leaf
> > outputpwr       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.1 : leaf
> > outputloadlvl   : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.5.1 : leaf
> >
> > check/column:ibmupstmp
> >
> > IBMTemp         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5.0               : leaf
> > IBMHumi         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.6.0               : leaf
> >
> > For temperature output, it says unknown and the other checks all have
> > unknown/no data (with no SNMP data in logs)
> >
> > Is it perhaps something to do with the ending in 0 or not? I do remember
> > testing those out.
>
> I don't think that the last digit of the OID does matter.
>
> Assuming that also the OIDS defined in the transforms-files all have
> different names, the next thing you could check is the behaviour of the IBM
> UPS device. If the temperature-probe is removed, can you get the
> information of all the OIDs starting with ".1.3.6.`.2.1.33", using a basic
> utility like snmpget? If so, there must be something wrong in devmon. If
> not so, the UPS is behaving strangely.
>
> Regards,
>    Wim Nelis.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[W.J.M. N. <Wim...@nl...>]

Hello  Steve,

> here is what I have in the ibmups template I have made (in terms of oids)
>
> check/column:batt-capacity
>
> upsBatteryStatus        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.1.0               : leaf
> upsEstimatedminsrem     : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.3.0               : leaf
> upsEstimateChargerem    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.4.0               : leaf
> upsBattVoltage          : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.5.0               : leaf
>
> check/column:ibmupspwr
>
> inputvolt       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.3.1 : leaf
> inputfreq       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.2.1 : leaf
> outputvolt      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.2.1 : leaf
> outputcurr      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.3.1 : leaf
> outputpwr       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.1 : leaf
> outputloadlvl   : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.5.1 : leaf
>
> check/column:ibmupstmp
>
> IBMTemp         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5.0               : leaf
> IBMHumi         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.6.0               : leaf
>
> For temperature output, it says unknown and the other checks all have
> unknown/no data (with no SNMP data in logs)
>
> Is it perhaps something to do with the ending in 0 or not? I do remember
> testing those out.

I don't think that the last digit of the OID does matter.

Assuming that also the OIDS defined in the transforms-files all have 
different names, the next thing you could check is the behaviour of the IBM 
UPS device. If the temperature-probe is removed, can you get the 
information of all the OIDs starting with ".1.3.6.`.2.1.33", using a basic 
utility like snmpget? If so, there must be something wrong in devmon. If 
not so, the UPS is behaving strangely.

Regards,
   Wim Nelis.

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[Ken C. <kco...@ry...>]

Also note, I've seen where I have had an incorrect oid within one
test-template, and that snowballs and kills other tests which where
previously fine.

So I'd do some baby-steps and strip down the template testing one test at a
time and adding other tests as things go well.
On Jan 26, 2016 8:22 AM, "Steve B" <rec...@gm...> wrote:

> Hi Wim,
>
> here is what I have in the ibmups template I have made (in terms of oids)
>
> check/column:batt-capacity
>
> upsBatteryStatus        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.1.0               : leaf
> upsEstimatedminsrem     : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.3.0               : leaf
> upsEstimateChargerem    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.4.0               : leaf
> upsBattVoltage          : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.5.0               : leaf
>
> check/column:ibmupspwr
>
> inputvolt       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.3.1 : leaf
> inputfreq       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.2.1 : leaf
> outputvolt      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.2.1 : leaf
> outputcurr      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.3.1 : leaf
> outputpwr       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.1 : leaf
> outputloadlvl   : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.5.1 : leaf
>
> check/column:ibmupstmp
>
> IBMTemp         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5.0               : leaf
> IBMHumi         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.6.0               : leaf
>
> For temperature output, it says unknown and the other checks all have
> unknown/no data (with no SNMP data in logs)
>
> Is it perhaps something to do with the ending in 0 or not? I do remember
> testing those out.
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:06 PM, W.J.M. Nelis <Wim...@nl...> wrote:
>
> > Hello Steve,
> >
> > >> any ideas on this one? I am monitoring 2 IBM UPS devices (per site)
> and
> > >> testing temperature/humidity snmp monitoring which gives results if
> > probe
> > >> is installed. So I have a temp check, battery capacity and power.
> When
> > the
> > >> probe is installed, I have results for all these checks but if I
> remove
> > the
> > >> probe, the temp check gives unknown as entries and this spreads to the
> > >> other checks for that host with the dreaded "No SNMP data found
> > for...." in
> > >> the logs so I get white faces and greens with barely any results
> (there
> > are
> > >> a few).
> >
> > > Unfortunately I have seen the 'No SNMP data found' quite a lot.
> > >
> > > "Are the variables in  the templates in use linked with one another
> > > somehow?"
> > >
> > > Do the oid names have to be different for every template (if the oids
> > > themselves are different). Is this something I could use to look into
> why
> > > this is happening. Just seems a shame that none of the checks for that
> > host
> > > don't work if the probe is not present. I am looking into making an
> > > alternate template for probe present but it's a massive cleanup job, I
> > have
> > > over 3k hosts world wide.
> > >
> > No, the OID names are so to say 'local to the template'. However, your
> > complaint is about various tests within the same template. Form the
> > documentation file called TEMPLATES:
> >
> >    Also important to note is that OIDs are shared between tests
> >    on the same template.  So if you specify OID aliases with
> >    identical names (they are case sensitive, remember) in multiple
> >    tests in a template, there is only going to be a single value
> >    stored in memory, which both OID aliases point to.  The upshot
> >    of this is, if you use the same OID alias in multiple tests
> >    (and this is recommended, as it will make your template run
> >    faster), then they *MUST* have the numeric OID value.  If
> >    they dont, you are going to get inconsistent results, as
> >    the value stored in memory might arbitrarily be from one SNMP
> >    variable or another.
> >
> > To rephrase my question: do you have OIDs in the various tests with the
> > same name while they represent different things?
> >
> > Regards,
> >    Wim Nelis.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devmon-support mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[Steve B <rec...@gm...>]

Hi Wim,

here is what I have in the ibmups template I have made (in terms of oids)

check/column:batt-capacity

upsBatteryStatus        : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.1.0               : leaf
upsEstimatedminsrem     : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.3.0               : leaf
upsEstimateChargerem    : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.4.0               : leaf
upsBattVoltage          : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.2.5.0               : leaf

check/column:ibmupspwr

inputvolt       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.3.1 : leaf
inputfreq       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.3.3.1.2.1 : leaf
outputvolt      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.2.1 : leaf
outputcurr      : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.3.1 : leaf
outputpwr       : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.4.1 : leaf
outputloadlvl   : .1.3.6.1.2.1.33.1.4.4.1.5.1 : leaf

check/column:ibmupstmp

IBMTemp         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.5.0               : leaf
IBMHumi         : 1.3.6.1.4.1.534.1.6.6.0               : leaf

For temperature output, it says unknown and the other checks all have
unknown/no data (with no SNMP data in logs)

Is it perhaps something to do with the ending in 0 or not? I do remember
testing those out.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:06 PM, W.J.M. Nelis <Wim...@nl...> wrote:

> Hello Steve,
>
> >> any ideas on this one? I am monitoring 2 IBM UPS devices (per site) and
> >> testing temperature/humidity snmp monitoring which gives results if
> probe
> >> is installed. So I have a temp check, battery capacity and power.  When
> the
> >> probe is installed, I have results for all these checks but if I remove
> the
> >> probe, the temp check gives unknown as entries and this spreads to the
> >> other checks for that host with the dreaded "No SNMP data found
> for...." in
> >> the logs so I get white faces and greens with barely any results (there
> are
> >> a few).
>
> > Unfortunately I have seen the 'No SNMP data found' quite a lot.
> >
> > "Are the variables in  the templates in use linked with one another
> > somehow?"
> >
> > Do the oid names have to be different for every template (if the oids
> > themselves are different). Is this something I could use to look into why
> > this is happening. Just seems a shame that none of the checks for that
> host
> > don't work if the probe is not present. I am looking into making an
> > alternate template for probe present but it's a massive cleanup job, I
> have
> > over 3k hosts world wide.
> >
> No, the OID names are so to say 'local to the template'. However, your
> complaint is about various tests within the same template. Form the
> documentation file called TEMPLATES:
>
>    Also important to note is that OIDs are shared between tests
>    on the same template.  So if you specify OID aliases with
>    identical names (they are case sensitive, remember) in multiple
>    tests in a template, there is only going to be a single value
>    stored in memory, which both OID aliases point to.  The upshot
>    of this is, if you use the same OID alias in multiple tests
>    (and this is recommended, as it will make your template run
>    faster), then they *MUST* have the numeric OID value.  If
>    they dont, you are going to get inconsistent results, as
>    the value stored in memory might arbitrarily be from one SNMP
>    variable or another.
>
> To rephrase my question: do you have OIDs in the various tests with the
> same name while they represent different things?
>
> Regards,
>    Wim Nelis.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[W.J.M. N. <Wim...@nl...>]

Hello Steve,

>> any ideas on this one? I am monitoring 2 IBM UPS devices (per site) and
>> testing temperature/humidity snmp monitoring which gives results if probe
>> is installed. So I have a temp check, battery capacity and power.  When the
>> probe is installed, I have results for all these checks but if I remove the
>> probe, the temp check gives unknown as entries and this spreads to the
>> other checks for that host with the dreaded "No SNMP data found for...." in
>> the logs so I get white faces and greens with barely any results (there are
>> a few).

> Unfortunately I have seen the 'No SNMP data found' quite a lot.
>
> "Are the variables in  the templates in use linked with one another
> somehow?"
>
> Do the oid names have to be different for every template (if the oids
> themselves are different). Is this something I could use to look into why
> this is happening. Just seems a shame that none of the checks for that host
> don't work if the probe is not present. I am looking into making an
> alternate template for probe present but it's a massive cleanup job, I have
> over 3k hosts world wide.
>
No, the OID names are so to say 'local to the template'. However, your 
complaint is about various tests within the same template. Form the 
documentation file called TEMPLATES:

   Also important to note is that OIDs are shared between tests
   on the same template.  So if you specify OID aliases with
   identical names (they are case sensitive, remember) in multiple
   tests in a template, there is only going to be a single value
   stored in memory, which both OID aliases point to.  The upshot
   of this is, if you use the same OID alias in multiple tests
   (and this is recommended, as it will make your template run
   faster), then they *MUST* have the numeric OID value.  If
   they dont, you are going to get inconsistent results, as
   the value stored in memory might arbitrarily be from one SNMP
   variable or another.

To rephrase my question: do you have OIDs in the various tests with the 
same name while they represent different things?

Regards,
   Wim Nelis.

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[Steve B <rec...@gm...>]

Unfortunately I have seen the 'No SNMP data found' quite a lot.

"Are the variables in  the templates in use linked with one another
somehow?"

Do the oid names have to be different for every template (if the oids
themselves are different). Is this something I could use to look into why
this is happening. Just seems a shame that none of the checks for that host
don't work if the probe is not present. I am looking into making an
alternate template for probe present but it's a massive cleanup job, I have
over 3k hosts world wide.

thanks to both of you for the replies.

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:18 AM, W.J.M. Nelis <Wim...@nl...> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
>
> > any ideas on this one? I am monitoring 2 IBM UPS devices (per site) and
> > testing temperature/humidity snmp monitoring which gives results if a
> probe
> > is installed. So I have a temp check, battery capacity and power.  When
> the
> > probe is installed, I have results for all these checks but if I remove
> the
> > probe, the temp check gives unknown as entries and this spreads to the
> > other checks for that host with the dreaded "No SNMP data found for...."
> in
> > the logs so I get white faces and greens with barely any results (there
> are
> > a few).
>
> I've never seen such spreading of the message "No SNMP data found"-status.
> Are the variables in  the templates in use linked with one another somehow?
>
> > How can I say to devmon, please only monitor the temp if the probe is
> > present (and leave the other checks alone)? Or is there another way to
> look
> > at this?
>
> If the availability of the temp probe does not change too fast, you might
> circumvent the problem by specifying which tests should be performed in the
> DEVMON-directive of the host in the xymon configuration file hosts.cfg.
>
>
> Regards,
>    Wim Nelis.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Devmon-support mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devmon-support
>

Re: [Devmon] probe monitoring present / not present no snmp data found

[W.J.M. N. <Wim...@nl...>]

Hi Steve,

> any ideas on this one? I am monitoring 2 IBM UPS devices (per site) and
> testing temperature/humidity snmp monitoring which gives results if a probe
> is installed. So I have a temp check, battery capacity and power.  When the
> probe is installed, I have results for all these checks but if I remove the
> probe, the temp check gives unknown as entries and this spreads to the
> other checks for that host with the dreaded "No SNMP data found for...." in
> the logs so I get white faces and greens with barely any results (there are
> a few).

I've never seen such spreading of the message "No SNMP data found"-status. 
Are the variables in  the templates in use linked with one another somehow?

> How can I say to devmon, please only monitor the temp if the probe is
> present (and leave the other checks alone)? Or is there another way to look
> at this?

If the availability of the temp probe does not change too fast, you might 
circumvent the problem by specifying which tests should be performed in the 
DEVMON-directive of the host in the xymon configuration file hosts.cfg.


Regards,
   Wim Nelis.