|
From: Arnaud Gomes-do-V. <Arn...@ir...> - 2013-05-07 13:40:01
|
Hello Heiko, "Heiko Zuerker" <he...@zu...> writes: > Before I add it, just a couple of questions: > > How's bird different from quagga? Two main differences: - BIRD has a more "system", less "network" approach to its configuration: to reconfigure it, just edit bird.conf and send it SIGHUP (Quagga has a more Cisco-like "change the live config through the CLI then save it" approach). - More important, from my limited experience, BIRD tends to be less buggy than Quagga, particularly when using OSPFv3. Quagga's ospf6d has been described by its authors as "alpha/beta quality" and this is quite close to the truth. > What's the benefit with having both in DL? Choice. :-) >From our point of view, we are currently switching from Quagga to BIRD so it would be easier to have it in DL. If you don't want to ship both I will have to maintain a separate patch; I can perfectly understand this. I can't promise I will track upstream BIRD releases closely as we don't tend to upgrade our DL boxes very often. -- Arnaud |