Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] deprecated oom_adj in udevd

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

I now have a working version with the new udev.
Unfortunately it doesn't like our aoe rule set and even complains about some
of its own.
I don't think this is worth potentially delaying the final 1.6... Thoughts?

-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heiko Zuerker [mailto:he...@zu...]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 12:32 PM
> To: dev...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] deprecated oom_adj in udevd
> 
> Serge,
> 
> Quoting Serge Leschinsky <ser...@gm...>:
> > I have a working udev-173. It seems to be the last "old" udev (no
> > mandatory /run, do devfs, no kmod etc) - if you don't mind I'll update
> > DL to this version.
> 
> Yes that would be great.
> I'll keep looking into the "new" udev, but only have limited time
available.
> 
> --
> 
> Regards
>    Heiko Zuerker
>    http://www.devil-linux.org
> 
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is
> just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro
> Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss