From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2012-03-05 16:46:44
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > I upgraded the kernel in CVS to 3.2.9 over the weekend. Could you > verify that this problem still exists in the newer version? > If yes, then I don't see an issue with adding the patch. Heiko, I will check this problem. Maybe unsorted list of interfaces in /proc/net/dev is by error, not by design. Or maybe not. I will test my patch in both 32-bit and 64-bit compilation, because, as for now I only tested it on 32-bit compilation on my router. Iptraf code is old and raw, so there can be surprises with completly succesfull patching. As you now, there is try of reneval of iptraf, named iptraf-ng, but without serious changes. I was not sure, what I should patch: iptraf or iptraf-ng? So my changes was very delicate, possible to adopting on iptraf-ng too. So this patch is as for now, rather for testing, not for final application. But iptraf is still a very handy tool, so is worth adopting to current kernels. Regards Andrzej Odyniec |