Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] multiple bonds devices

[Motycka J. <mai...@vc...>]

Hello.
I have tested this patch and it is ok for me.
I have tested it on this setup:
2 bond devices (bond0, bond1) each with 2 slaves.
bond0 OPTS: max_bonds=2 mode=2 miimon=100
bond1 OPTS: mode=4 miimon=100
And after system stats up, I have this in proc:

/proc/net/bonding/bond0:
Bonding Mode: load balancing (xor)
Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
Up Delay (ms): 0
Down Delay (ms): 0

Slave Interface: eth1
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:04:76:15:ef:c1

Slave Interface: eth2
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:04:76:15:8b:e6



/proc/net/bonding/bond1:
Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
Up Delay (ms): 0
Down Delay (ms): 0

802.3ad info
LACP rate: slow
Aggregator selection policy (ad_select): stable
Active Aggregator Info:
         Aggregator ID: 1
         Number of ports: 2
         Actor Key: 9
         Partner Key: 3
         Partner Mac Address: 00:1c:c5:a3:92:e0

Slave Interface: eth3
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:04:76:15:ef:bc
Aggregator ID: 1

Slave Interface: eth4
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:50:da:19:85:e2
Aggregator ID: 1


Thanks.
Jiri


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] multiple bonds devices
From: Serge Leschinsky <ser...@gm...>
To: dev...@li...
CC: Motycka Jiri <mai...@vc...>
Date: 04/15/2011 10:39 AM
> Jiri,
>
> could you please test/check the attached patch?
>
> Thanks,
> Serge
>
> On 03/28/2011 11:49 PM, Motycka Jiri wrote:
>> Thank you very much for this quick workaround. It is functional for 
>> me too.
>> I have made submission of a  bug to the DL bugtrack system.
>>
>> Jiri Motycka