|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2010-11-06 09:51:11
|
Not sure if you are quite serious about the point'n'click gui for building apps? It's not quite in the spirit of DL is it?! But I like the idea anyway. Are you thinking of a website which would be based around a DL build environment and allow visitors to custom-build their DL without having to create their own build system. Like Thinstation's TS-O-Matic <http://www.thinstation.org/>? I take your point about running apps causing bloat but surely a library such as librsync is not using any RAM unless it is being called? Same goes for rdiff-backup; unlike bacula (I think), it only runs as a process while it is active. In general, even daemon-based apps only use RAM if the user chooses to enable them (usually via DL setup). And there is plenty of space on the CD. Dominic On 06/11/2010 09:20, Dick Middleton wrote: > On 11/06/10 07:52, Dominic Raferd wrote: >> Well TimeDicer<http://www.timedicer.co.uk> is written by me so I >> might be a bit biased -:) > I think there's a good case for DL having application build modules. So > you can custom build your install iso including or not the apps of your > choice. Using a handy-dandy point and click gui of course :-) Then new > apps like this can be offered more easily. > > The main problem is that all apps sit in ram on the running system > whether they are used or not. Bloat is a bigger issue for DL than for > HDD based distributions because of this. > > Dick > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper > David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a > Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your > business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |