|
From: Moray M. <mmc...@ox...> - 2009-10-22 09:19:50
|
We've used openvpn to run up to 15 concurrent tunnels on a very basic machine (512M, Atom single core) with no issues whatsoever - based on the memory footprint, I would have thought we could have upped this very substantially without issue. It seems unlikely there would be a significant difference in bandwidth although I have never measured this. M. ------------------------------------- Moray McConnachie Director of IT +44 1865 261 600 Oxford Analytica http://www.oxan.com -----Original Message----- From: Frank Weis [mailto:Fra...@ct...] Sent: 22 October 2009 10:06 To: dev...@li... Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Site 2 Site Tunnels Hi all, thanks to Andrzej's very extensive reply I will have another go at trying IPsec in 1.4RC2 today. I probably missed something stupid Andrzej also uses openvpn tunnels for site2site links, which raises this question for me: Have any of you experience or knowledge to share how these two compare regarding a) cpu/memory usage b) bandwidth overhead Any thoughts? Thanks a lot Frank -- _______________________________________________ Centre de Technologie de l'Education 29 avenue John F. Kennedy L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg email: Fra...@ct... tél.: +352 247-85973 fax: +352 333797 _______________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-discuss mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |