Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Site 2 Site Tunnels

[Moray M. <mmc...@ox...>]

We've used openvpn to run up to 15 concurrent tunnels on a very basic machine (512M, Atom single core) with no issues whatsoever - based on the memory footprint, I would have thought we could have upped this very substantially without issue.

It seems unlikely there would be a significant difference in bandwidth although I have never measured this.

M.

------------------------------------- 
Moray McConnachie
Director of IT    +44 1865 261 600
Oxford Analytica  http://www.oxan.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Weis [mailto:Fra...@ct...] 
Sent: 22 October 2009 10:06
To: dev...@li...
Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Site 2 Site Tunnels

Hi all,

thanks to Andrzej's very extensive reply I will have another go at trying IPsec in 1.4RC2 today. I probably missed something stupid

Andrzej also uses openvpn tunnels for site2site links, which raises this question for me:

Have any of you experience or knowledge to share how these two compare regarding
a) cpu/memory usage
b) bandwidth overhead

Any thoughts?

Thanks a lot

Frank

--
_______________________________________________
  Centre de Technologie de l'Education
  29 avenue John F. Kennedy
  L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg
  email: Fra...@ct...
  tél.: +352 247-85973
  fax: +352 333797
_______________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss