|
From: Moray M. <mmc...@ox...> - 2009-10-21 15:44:29
|
>Under the hood, ESX and ESXi are really Linux, so it seems silly to me >that it requires a Windows client to admin the server. I wondered about this, because ESXi claims one of its differences with ESX is that it doesn't rely on an underlying OS. To which I thought: eh? Comparing ESX and ESXi they say: "Although neither hypervisor relies on an OS for resource management, VMware ESX relies on a Linux operating system, called the service console, to perform two management functions: executing scripts and installing third party agents for hardware monitoring, backup or systems management. The service console has been removed from ESXi, drastically reducing the hypervisor footprint and completing the ongoing trend of migrating management functionality from the local command line interface to remote management tools. The smaller code base of ESXi represents a smaller "attack surface" and less code to patch, improving reliability and security. The functionally of the service console is replaced by remote command line interfaces and adherence to system management standards." To which I still think: eh? Just remember less is more guys, less is more. http://www.vmware.com/products/esxi/uses.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-discuss mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |