|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@re...> - 2008-05-28 13:35:29
|
I don't recall having any plans to replace those scripts. Perhaps someone else said they were going to? - BS > I don't think there's an elegant way right now. > You can always just create your own init script from the > /etc/init.d/skeleton file and make sure it starts early, then you don't have > to worry about it being overwritten by an update. > > I would wait with changing the init script, Bruce was planing on replacing > the scripts. Is that still correct Bruce? > > -- > > Regards > Heiko Zuerker > http://www.devil-linux.org > > Quoting "Rudner, Björn" <br...@ba...>: > > Hi List, > I'm using DL with heartbeat - ldirector and apache for a long time now. > Now I'm doing some tests with upgrades from the "old" /etc to the "new" /etc > - storage. > One thing that I ran over on this is the following: > Since I use Apache as an active/active-cluster on two boxes I need to assign > a whole bunch of secondary IP-addresses (right now > 20 > virtual-IP-Addresses) to the Loopback-Interface. > (Ldirector routes these from one node to the other and therefore the > IP-Adresses must be known there internally - Also the Apaches bind to these > addresses.) > Heartbeat then removes them from the Loopback and assings them to the > physical interface and issues an arp-update to the connected routers on the > active node. > On the other hand it removes these IP-adresses from the physical NIC and > assignes it back to the Loopback as the node goes standby. > At the moment I have just added some "ip addr add" commands to > /etc/init.d/localnet. The adresses must be known before apache and heartbeat > starts (else heartbeat will not move them back to loopback when the node > goes standby) > Since this is a quick & dirty method I also have to keep an eye on that file > on every DL-update (it is not choosen to be kept by default on updates) > Now to my question: > Is there already a smarter way (I may have overlooked) to assign secondary > IP-addresses to the loopback interface early in the boot-process without the > need to change the init-scripts? > If there is not I might try to rework the localnet-script to reflect those > needs to keep this update-save. > Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind regards, |