Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DL configuration

[Serge L. <fi...@in...>]

Bruce Smith wrote:

>>> Actually the 2.6 kernel is pretty good in detecting which modules to  
>>> load, so we may not need to worry about this anymore.
>>>
>> Heiko, I'm afraid it's not so good as we expect. To check it you may want to
>> install DL on SATA HDD - most probably it will not boot (conf media not found,
>> DL cdrom not found). The problem is in busybox's mdev (I think so) that is why
>> Ubuntu Live-CD has original udev binaries linked against uclibc, not busybox.
> 
> What about a SATA CDROM?  Would that be a good test?
I suppose yes.  My expectation is that you will get "DL cd not found" but I
would be happy to be wrong.

--
Serge