Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DL configuration

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> > Actually the 2.6 kernel is pretty good in detecting which modules to  
> > load, so we may not need to worry about this anymore.
> > 
> Heiko, I'm afraid it's not so good as we expect. To check it you may want to
> install DL on SATA HDD - most probably it will not boot (conf media not found,
> DL cdrom not found). The problem is in busybox's mdev (I think so) that is why
> Ubuntu Live-CD has original udev binaries linked against uclibc, not busybox.

What about a SATA CDROM?  Would that be a good test?

I have one system with a SATA CD drive, that I could try to boot DL on.

 - BS