Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DL configuration/Unionfs

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> >> both unionfs and aufs are std in Debian if you've got a deb desktop.
> >
> > What's the difference between unionfs & aufs?  Does DL have aufs?
> > Which one should we use for this?
> 
> I don't know what the difference is. Aufs is not in DL right now.
> If aufs is really more stable and maybe better maintained, then we  
> should go for that one.
> We also need to choose wisely, so we don't have to wait for a patch  
> for a new kernel for a couple of months.

I looked at both web pages, and unionfs impressed me as being better
maintained than aufs.  

I don't know the difference in functionality. (yet :)

I also noticed another alternative that is not part of the kernel, but
uses FUSE.  (for the name now)

 - BS