|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-09-09 14:19:27
|
On Thu, September 6, 2007 14:21, Jasper Siepkes wrote: > Hi all, > > > I noted that OpenSwan was recently replaced by StrongSwan. Out of > curiosity; Why was this ? I saw an other thread on the mailinglist which > stated that strongswan was built on top of openswan with extra features. > As far as I know, this is not the case and were both forked from the > freeswan project (I Could be missing something tough..). > > I'm by no means a *Swan expert, but this comparison looks to be leaning > to Openswan: http://wiki.openswan.org/index.php/Openswan/FeatureComparison > > > Yes its on the openswan page :-) But StrongSwan > http://www.strongswan.org/ linkes to the feature comparison. I doubt > they would link to it if they would find it unfair. Unfortunately OpenSwan 3.0 (which is the base for this comparison) is not released yet: Quote from http://www.openswan.org/code/ : ---------------- Openswan 3.0.xx should be consider highly experimental and very unstable. Do not use it. ---------------- -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |