|
From: Bogdan P. <pet...@ya...> - 2007-03-11 16:26:48
|
Hello all, Did anybody experienced problems with ntpd similar to this: Mar 11 11:55:38 src@esgaroth ntpdate[7253]: step time server 216.27.160.99 offset -0.019538 sec Mar 11 11:55:40 src@esgaroth jk_socketd[7512]: listening on socket /jail/NTPD/dev/log with rates [2048:4096]/10 Mar 11 11:55:40 src@esgaroth ntpd[7515]: ntpd 4.2.4@1.1437-o Thu Mar 1 06:34:22 UTC 2007 (1) Mar 11 11:55:40 src@esgaroth ntpd[7515]: signal_no_reset: signal 13 had flags 4000000 Mar 11 11:55:40 src@esgaroth ntpd[7515]: set_process_priority: Leave priority alone: priority_done is <2> Mar 11 11:55:40 src@esgaroth ntpd[7515]: precision = 2.000 usec Mar 11 11:55:40 src@esgaroth ntpd[7515]: ntp_io: estimated max descriptors: 1024, initial socket boundary: 16 Mar 11 11:55:40 src@esgaroth ntpd[7515]: Listening on interface #0 wildcard, 0.0.0.0#123 Disabled Mar 11 11:55:40 src@esgaroth ntpd[7515]: bind() fd 17, family 10, port 123, scope 0, addr ::, in6_is_addr_multicast=0 flags=129 fails: Address already in use Mar 11 11:55:40 src@esgaroth ntpd[7515]: unable to bind to wildcard socket address :: - another process may be running - EXITING >From a couple of google searches it seems like this could be a ntp bug but I just wanted to know if anybody has seen this problem and found any workaround. Best regards -------------------------------- Being in the majority means that most people agree with you; it does not mean that you are right. -------------------------------- ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html |