|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-09-09 16:23:09
|
On Fri, September 8, 2006 14:11, Kari Mattsson wrote: > Bruce Smith wrote: > >>>> BUT we have XFS included, which has support for this. Good enough? >>>> >>>> >>> Mmm.. I reformatted the reiserfs on the test system to xfs. >>> Nope, it didn't quite do it. With options 'defaults,acl' mount still >>> gives arror >>> >>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda1, >>> missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in >>> syslog >>> >>> ...and in syslog: >>> >>> >>> ..... kernel: XFS: unknown mount option [acl]. >>> >>> >> >> I'm not sure you need to mount XFS with the acl option for ACL's to >> work. >> >> Mount the XFS volume with just 'defaults' and try to create an ACL. >> > > Good try ;-) ...however, setfacl consistently (ext2/ext3/reiserfs/xfs) > responded: > > > # setfacl -m user:jdoe:r file1 > setfacl: file1: Operation not supported OK from what I could find out, it seems we still need to apply the separate AE+ACL patches to the kernel. http://acl.bestbits.at/ Those patches are quite old, no idea if they will even apply to Kernel 2.4.33.x ... There also seems that the XFS AE+ACL stuff never made it in the mainstream Kernel and it has to be extracted from the XFS CVS repository... I doubt I'll have time this weekend to look at it any more. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |